felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>
Subject Re: TLP migration questions...
Date Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:29:48 GMT
Felix Meschberger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Initially, I was convinced, too, that a users@ list would not be needed
> given the current volume.
>
> On the other hand, and as Niclas pointed out, more and more questions are
> more like users@ questions than dev@ questions. Additionally, I tend 
> to see
> a somewhat psychological aspect of having a users@ list: Maybe it is 
> better
> for community building to have a low-barrier users@ list in addition 
> to the
> dev@ list.
>
> Therefore, I now agree with Niclas, that we probably need a users@ list.

I can go either way and I think Karl said he could too, so unless anyone 
has any major objections, I guess we can go with a users mailing list.

This then raises another question. I assume that they move the mailing 
list archives and subscriber list from the old list to the new 
list...should the felix-dev archive and its subscribers move to dev or 
users ?

-> richard
>
> Just my €.02
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
>
>
> On 4/19/07, Niclas Hedhman <niclas@hedhman.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday 19 April 2007 03:31, Richard S. Hall wrote:
>> > I am not convinced that we need a "users" list, just brought it up for
>> > discussion.
>>
>> I am convinced a users@ list is appropriate.
>>
>> Just look at the last 10 threads on the current list (this one 
>> excluded);
>>
>> -1. Felix/OSGi and JADE Second Part  -> users@
>> -2. bundle with felix.auto.start.2 are not starting  -> users@
>> -3. new release  -> dev@
>> -4. Bundle symbolic name not unique? -> users@
>> -5. Bundle repository -> users@
>> -6. [jira] Created: (FELIX-270) iPOJO Composition & Arch improve...  ->
>> dev@
>> -7. Launching/Embedding docs  ->  both
>> -8. JADE and OSGI integration  -> users@
>> -9. 101.6.4 of R4.1? Service Compendium  -> dev@
>> -10. Felix TLP migration -> dev@
>>
>> 5 exclusive users@ list threads, 4 dev@ ones.
>>
>> On top of that, it is likely (although not very strong argument) that
>> Felix
>> will get a lot more traction once visible as TLP, and even more so 
>> with a
>> 1.0
>> release out. That means more Jira issues, that most users don't want to
>> see,
>> et cetera.
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>> Niclas
>>
>

Mime
View raw message