Mailing-List: contact felix-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: felix-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of carlossg@gmail.com designates
 64.233.182.185 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=bgTC82zoiAhhzgkTdIILYhCndRoxWADSJ3r3CWN24L2610t6CxL8MLN5FMRu0Vb4bTng5VcJ4rpwQ8suQ5RHMbJ1aa4AUuT/NWmHrArimpK5E6iM4+tsf+QF4pBNYAnDUe+XLhP2GfmBnN9JwKeSFUbpfVzSEIzpHyJakXJ328s=
Message-ID: <1a5b6c410703081315q6c7ae068gfb7f612ee1750d6b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:15:13 -0800
From: "Carlos Sanchez" <carlos@apache.org>
Sender: carlossg@gmail.com
To: felix-dev@incubator.apache.org, erodriguez@apache.org
Subject: Re: What about Felix Commons
In-Reply-To: <568753d90703081249g5644d3aeue32866d5d1880605@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <87eb8aee0703080407x2f57cfr76ede4088d04a70a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1a5b6c410703081141s58a5f45br848f912e3a6dbfea@mail.gmail.com>
	 <568753d90703081249g5644d3aeue32866d5d1880605@mail.gmail.com>

this is the first step, having a public place for consumption of osgi
bundles, with osgi manifests and OBR metadata.
I'm still puting all pieces together for osgi-maven relation, I'll
keep informe after i digest all the stuff i'm finding out ;)

On 3/8/07, Enrique Rodriguez <enriquer9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/8/07, Carlos Sanchez <carlos@apache.org> wrote:
> > I'm also interested on this, i was talking with several people at
> > EclipseCON and also here on the list, and seems that having an
> > equivalent to the maven repository with osgi bundles and OBR metadata
> > would be a good way to go.
>
> Would anything change at the same time about how m2 processes
> transitive dependencies?  How could this repo support better the
> "Import/Export" model (as opposed to the "Require Bundle" model)?
>
> It would be nice to better align m2 with the OSGi "Import/Export"
> model.  In any case, seeing OSGi with first-class support in m2 would
> be great.
>
> Enrique
>


-- 
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
                             -- The Princess Bride