felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marcel Offermans <marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl>
Subject Re: Re[2]: Felix Util Bundle
Date Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:11:47 GMT
On Mar 19, 2007, at 11:58 , Felix Meschberger wrote:

> On 3/19/07, Peter Kriens <Peter.Kriens@aqute.biz> wrote:
>> Of course many of the problems are alleviated if the code is  
>> included in the target JAR and not imported.
> True. If we include the classes by using tools such as the great  
> BND this is
> ok, still it might create duplicate class instances, which might or  
> might
> not be a problem with respect to memory consumption and performance. I
> personally like to share as much as possible (but to create as minimal
> dependencies as possible, of course).

We should probably not call this code a "bundle" and leave it up to  
the user to either wrap it in a bundle or just inline the needed code  
(on the other hand, there's no harm done when we distribute it as a  
utility bundle that exports its classes anyway).

Something that might be interesting here is to use Bnd together with  
one of the code obfuscators. Not to obfuscate anything, but to rip  
out all utility code that is not used. That way you can just inline  
the stuff you actually use.

That could be a strategy to try with all utility bundles, not just  
this one. It might save you a lot of code in big libraries of which  
you use only a small portion.

Greetings, Marcel

View raw message