felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>
Subject Re: maven-bundle-plugin proposal
Date Sun, 28 Jan 2007 21:25:13 GMT
Alex Karasulu wrote:
> I agree with Alan here.  Maven can get ugly with you if you start to 
> stray from it's conventions.  It might be worth considering his approach.

It seems that we just have to figure out exactly what its conventions are...

However, I am more aligned with Chris, get it working now and sweat the 
details later.

-> richard

>
> Alex
>
> Richard S. Hall wrote:
>> Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>>> On 1/26/07, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> One thing we could possibly do is to allow both:
>>>>
>>>> <embed-dependency>
>>>> groupId=org.mortbay.jetty;artifactId=jetty,*;scope=runtime</embed-
>>>> dependency>
>>>>
>>>> or
>>>>
>>>> <embed>
>>>>      <match groupId="org.mortbay.jetty" artifactId="jetty"/>
>>>>      <match scope="runtime"/>
>>>> </embed>
>>>>
>>>> In the spirit of not trying to make more work for you, I would be
>>>> happy to contribute the latter.
>>>>
>>>
>>> A maven convention is not to use xml attributes but subelements
>>>
>>> <embed>
>>>     <match>
>>>        <groupId>org.mortbay.jetty</groupId>
>>>        <artifactId>jetty<artifactId/>
>>>     </match>
>>> </embed>
>>
>> Do I hear allowing all three!! ;-)
>>
>> -> richard
>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message