felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Francesco Furfari <francesco.furf...@isti.cnr.it>
Subject Re: Felix release approach
Date Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:06:08 GMT
right to mention that ... I was just noticing that Peter Kriens is not 
cited in notice file ;-)

+1
francesco


Richard S. Hall wrote:
> I remember yet another thing I wanted to mention...the current example 
> release is a source+binary release. I also anticipate that we will do 
> just a binary release archive, which would be pretty much the same as 
> the source release, but simply remove the trunk/ directory.
>
> -> richard
>
> Richard S. Hall wrote:
>> One other comment I should add, I am not anticipating that we release 
>> every bundle in the first initial release. I think the initial 
>> release will only include shell, shell.tui, bundlerepository just to 
>> get things going. Of course, we can debate this as part of this 
>> process, but the main goal is to just get something out there ASAP.
>>
>> -> richard
>>
>> Richard S. Hall wrote:
>>> Two weeks ago I started to get frustrated about not making any 
>>> progress on a Felix release. The main blocker for me is that I don't 
>>> really know anything about the installer package we have set up to 
>>> do "fancy" release packages with services, nor do I have enough time 
>>> to try to learn about it right now. In the end, I got to thinking 
>>> that we don't actually need to have a "fancy" release for our first 
>>> release and could instead just work on a simple "zip-file" release 
>>> that people just download and unzip.
>>>
>>> I worked with Karl Pauls over the last few days to create a simple 
>>> archive release that could meet the Apache release requirements. I 
>>> put an example of such a zip-file release for Felix 0.8.0 at:
>>>
>>>    
>>> http://people.apache.org/~rickhall/felix-src-0.8.0-incubator-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz

>>>
>>>
>>> Karl has examined this example release with the RAT tool, so we 
>>> think we have most of the issues covered. The purpose of this 
>>> message is to get feedback on two issues:
>>>
>>>   1. Whether or not everyone agrees that we should just go ahead with a
>>>      simple zip-file release. (I will call a formal vote on this in a
>>>      separate message so we will know one way or the other how to 
>>> proceed.)
>>>   2. Assuming that we do agree on (1), get feedback on the above
>>>      example release in case there are any issues that we still need to
>>>      address.
>>>
>>> If we can get consensus on this approach, then we can vote on the 
>>> release itself (assuming that we can fix any issues that may exist), 
>>> vote on a release manager to take responsibility for the release, 
>>> and then take the release to the incubator PMC.
>>>
>>> -> richard
>>>


Mime
View raw message