Mailing-List: contact felix-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: felix-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 16:24:21 +0200
From: stephane.frenot@insa-lyon.fr
To: felix-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Should I move JMood to the trunk?
Message-ID: <20060901142421.GA13015@ares-frenot-3.insa-lyon.fr>
References: <000001c6cda4$d6288c30$0600080a@dit.upm.es>
 <200609011817.28442.niclas@hedhman.org> <44F833A4.8060702@odoko.co.uk>
 <20060901132252.GA12003@ares-frenot-3.insa-lyon.fr>
 <44F8358E.4020203@ungoverned.org>
 <20060901134224.GA12079@ares-frenot-3.insa-lyon.fr>
 <44F8399B.30704@odoko.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <44F8399B.30704@odoko.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11

It's done.

Regards
/stephane
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 02:46:03PM +0100, Upayavira wrote:
> stephane.frenot@insa-lyon.fr wrote:
> > Actually I have a smarter solution, 
> > those libraries are dynamically downloaded in the Console (thanks to
> > OSGi :).
> > So I can remove the tab without problem and make it available from my
> > site as it was before. 
> > 
> > The only issue is that the tab is not hosted at apache svn.
> 
> Sounds good. Thanks for this. Note, this will need to be done before the
> incubator PMC vote which'll happen in maybe 1 week's time. :-(
> 
> Regards, Upayavira
> 
> 
> 
> > /stephane
> > On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 09:28:46AM -0400, Richard S. Hall wrote:
> >> stephane.frenot@insa-lyon.fr wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 02:20:36PM +0100, Upayavira wrote:
> >>>  
> >>>> Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> >>>>    
> >>>>> On Friday 01 September 2006 16:58, santillan wrote:
> >>>>>      
> >>>>>> Just a note: while JMood's initial version was LGPL'd, a software grant 
> >>>>>> was
> >>>>>> given to the ASF and the JMood code in the trunk is properly ASL'd.
> >>>>>> Moreover, I've removed the dependency to MX4J just in case (as it was 
> >>>>>> easy
> >>>>>> to refactor), so currently only depends on osgi.core, osgi.compendium, 
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>> framework and Junit, so no licensing problems here :-)
> >>>>>>        
> >>>>> Cool. So we are discussing a hypothetical case ;o)
> >>>>>      
> >>>> Well, the issue that remains is how we use jfree and jcommon, both of
> >>>> which are, as I understand it, Jmood dependencies, and both are LGPL.
> >>>>    
> >>> Not Jmood, but MOSGi dependencies.
> >> Yes, people seemed to have gotten lost. :-)
> >>
> >> Well, the way I see it, if we cannot find compatible graphing libraries, 
> >> then we can either remove the component and Stephane can host it 
> >> separately (perhaps at Source Forge) or we can create some sort of 
> >> bridging and make it optional somehow. Stephane probably knows what 
> >> makes the most sense.
> >>
> >> -> richard
> > 

-- 
Stephane Frenot - Associate professor | 
CITI/INRIA Ares - INSA lyon           | mailto:stephane.frenot@insa-lyon.fr
Bat. L�onard de Vinci                 | http://ares.insa-lyon.fr/~sfrenot/
21 av Jean Capelle                    | ICQ:643346 (et oui !)
69621 Villeurbanne Cedex              | +33 472 436 422 / +33 617 671 714
----------------------------------------------------------------------------