felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "John E. Conlon" <jcon...@verticon.com>
Subject Re: OSGi m2 plugin and transitive dependencies
Date Sat, 09 Sep 2006 03:19:13 GMT
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 11:40 +0800, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Thursday 07 September 2006 23:45, John E. Conlon wrote:
> 
> > If we:
> >  + left <scope> to do the first and second functions above (just like
> > standard maven projects expect it to do)
> >  + added a <inlinedArtifact> element to the dependency element to
> > indicate dependencies that are to be added to the bundle
> >  + allow <inlinedArtifact> to have child <exclusions> elements to
> > exclude transitives from our bundle.
> >
> > Would this overcome the problem and meet requirements?
> 
> IIUIC, that needs modifications to the Maven POM and that means changes to 
> Maven code. Why? I think that Maven parses the pom.xml into a Java hierarchy, 
> which is used for the merge of ancestors. Any unknown tags generate an error.
Oops - BAIK.

> During the 'release' process, the POM that is being uploaded to repositories 
> is target/exported-pom.xml, which is generated from the Java object 
> hierarchy. (again, I might have misunderstood the process here...)
> And if we have full Maven support behind changes, why not go for more explicit 
> support??
I think that's a good idea. 

Is Jason van Zyl still working on adding something in the standard maven
for creating OSGi bundles?



- John


Mime
View raw message