Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 96543 invoked from network); 3 May 2006 00:44:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 May 2006 00:44:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 59618 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2006 00:44:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-felix-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 59580 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2006 00:44:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact felix-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: felix-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list felix-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 59560 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2006 00:44:09 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 May 2006 17:44:09 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of aok123@bellsouth.net designates 205.152.59.72 as permitted sender) Received: from [205.152.59.72] (HELO imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net) (205.152.59.72) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 May 2006 17:44:07 -0700 Received: from ibm70aec.bellsouth.net ([65.80.200.112]) by imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060503004346.RXOU8512.imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm70aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 20:43:46 -0400 Received: from [172.16.1.7] (really [65.80.200.112]) by ibm70aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060503004346.FVKU18307.ibm70aec.bellsouth.net@[172.16.1.7]> for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 20:43:46 -0400 Message-ID: <4457FCC1.3090508@bellsouth.net> Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 20:43:45 -0400 From: Alex Karasulu User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060313) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: felix-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Dumb question References: <4433D530.4000107@ungoverned.org> <4433DF9D.2060005@luminis.nl> <1144319726.8714.28.camel@localhost.localdomain> <44579E63.6030807@isti.cnr.it> <4457B113.9070304@ungoverned.org> <4457B8B8.3050306@isti.cnr.it> <4457BC92.3040900@ungoverned.org> In-Reply-To: <4457BC92.3040900@ungoverned.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Richard S. Hall wrote: > Francesco Furfari wrote: >> I have the same difficult ...but you suggest these changes because >> you want easily install the bundles from a common location or because >> you don't like such flat structure (or both ;-) ). In the former case >> maybe it is possible to add some instructions to move every bundle in >> a common directory ... without big changes to the structure .... I'm >> just supposing :-) > > It is a little bit of both...I don't like having so much in the trunk, > especially since all of the names are so long...you basically get one > column in 'ls' which is already scrolling off the screen. > > Such hardships! :-) This is the price to pay for using the package name for the module name which does not necessarily have to be that way. You can still name the artifact with the package name to follow the eclipse bundle naming style and use short names for the module. It's really up to you. Personally I don't like this scheme at all. It sounded good when it was proposed but it's definitely an issue for working with the command line. With similar prefixes (pkg names) I can't even use shell tab completion properly. Alex