Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 39781 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2006 17:38:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Apr 2006 17:38:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 82292 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2006 17:38:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-felix-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 82225 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2006 17:38:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact felix-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: felix-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list felix-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 82214 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2006 17:38:44 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:38:44 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [66.112.202.2] (HELO mail.devtech.com) (66.112.202.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:38:43 -0700 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.devtech.com (JAMES SMTP Server 3.0-dev) with SMTP ID 375 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 13:38:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Noel J. Bergman" To: Subject: RE: STATUS vis-a-vis Incubation? Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 13:38:17 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <4448F6AF.3070701@ungoverned.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Richard S. Hall wrote: > I must say that I have been spending a lot of time worrying > about us getting a first public release of Felix out the > door and I would like to see that happen ASAP. > I think this should be priority number one. Just keep in mind that this is not the Incubator's priority. Releases can be sanctioned, but the only reason why we permit them at all is to help with community building. And I observe that a number of folks are saying that they won't adopt the code while it is in the Incubator, which is just fine with us, so you might get more bang for the buck doing a post-Incubation release. --- Noel