Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 84614 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2006 15:28:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Apr 2006 15:28:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 52018 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2006 15:28:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-felix-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 51972 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2006 15:28:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact felix-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: felix-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list felix-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 51960 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2006 15:28:42 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 08:28:42 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [217.160.230.41] (HELO mout.perfora.net) (217.160.230.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 08:28:42 -0700 Received: from [129.88.103.2] (helo=[129.88.103.2]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrelayus1) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKp2t-1FWEbM0kqq-00021H; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:28:21 -0400 Message-ID: <44465713.2010804@ungoverned.org> Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:28:19 -0400 From: "Richard S. Hall" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060313) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: felix-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: OSGi talks at ApacheCon EU 2006 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: perfora.net abuse@perfora.net login:b399c17105f59dfa36985f08f30e623d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Noel J. Bergman wrote: >> I cannot help but feel a little bummed because Peter Kriens' OSGi >> tutorial was not accepted >> > > Huh? I show it as having been accepted, and tentatively (tutorials are not > actually "accepted" until they reach a critical enrollment point) scheduled > for Tuesday afternoon. > Well, that is good news...perhaps it was listed elsewhere...Peter was under the impression that it wasn't accepted either. > We have to reject something on the order of 75% of all submissions, most of > which would be excellent. And we try to make sure that as many projects as > possible have some representation. OSGi actually has quite a bit of > coverage at the conference. > Yep, I wasn't bummed about OSGi coverage, just being greedy and wanting more. ;-) > The conference production company is supposed to send out notices. I just received mine. Thanks, Noel. -> richard