felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>
Subject Re: "Strict modularity" feedback
Date Sat, 22 Apr 2006 17:56:39 GMT
Sounds good. At least we are building up our experience to get a feel 
for how much we are impacted by strict modularity. Hopefully, it will 
stay positive.

-> richard

Enrique Rodriguez wrote:
> Richard S. Hall wrote:
> ...
>> The question I have is, were you able to determine why you needed 
>> these packages? Were they packages you were using and didn't include 
>> or were they from methods used on parent classes or what?
> I think in most of the cases I just needed to include system packages. 
> Maybe 1-2 cases were methods on parent classes.  I know in a couple 
> cases I had to intuit that the issue was missing import statements, 
> based on the missing class and my knowledge of our class hierarchy. 
> Once again, mangen will be a big help here.  Also, all of our package 
> names changed in a big refactoring over the holidays, so this was more 
> than just a move from Oscar to Felix - I had a lot of import/export 
> statements busted.
> Enrique

View raw message