felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>
Subject Re: Repository/package structure
Date Thu, 01 Dec 2005 19:05:58 GMT
Yes, since the symbolic name is supposed to be globally unique, the most 
reasonable choice is to use the full package name.

-> richard

Jeff McAffer wrote:
> just to be really really clear then, the BSN would be "
> org.apache.felix.http.jetty". 
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
>
> Rob Walker <robw@ascert.com> 
> 12/01/2005 12:28 PM
> Please respond to
> felix-dev
>
>
> To
> felix-dev@incubator.apache.org
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: Repository/package structure
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Is there any value in using the last 2 parts as the symbolic names - 
> that would give us 'http-jetty' for instance rather than just 'jetty'. 
> Struck me the latter could be confusing, at least in this specific case.
>
> -- Rob
>
> Richard S. Hall wrote:
>
>   
>> I think it seems reasonable to use it as the symbolic name, since we 
>> don't have any other useful candidate to fill that role...it is what I 
>> do currently with my own bundles.
>>
>> -> richard
>>
>> Jeff McAffer wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> Just to be clear, are the dir names also the bundle symbolic name? 
>>> FWIW, that is the eclipse convention and while it is not mandatory 
>>> that the names match, this tends to be the most tested and mostly 
>>> likely to work seamlessly path.  Then people just check out that dir 
>>> as a project and life in PDE is sweet.
>>>
>>> Jeff
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>
>
>
>
>   

Mime
View raw message