Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-oscar-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99552 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2005 16:08:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2005 16:08:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 75157 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2005 16:08:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-oscar-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 75036 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2005 16:08:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact oscar-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: oscar-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list oscar-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 75025 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2005 16:08:20 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 09:08:20 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of enriquer9@gmail.com designates 72.14.204.193 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.204.193] (HELO qproxy.gmail.com) (72.14.204.193) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 09:08:24 -0700 Received: by qproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q18so277902qba for ; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 09:07:57 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nW26UnLmVVuRfi+i6T8OAwWW7SG0ZwNeOlGFJJNDGIDVRHbpRbMruuz2MH/VVeGpcMVRTgIIUExz54YqawsPe8rUXHYYH91RScJWF1fxY1qs8PkR+SqN7Vpku+/HcSJgYfJDfTOlfAaYzXwWxybePTANYtMl1TSpdh3UHVG7O38= Received: by 10.65.54.18 with SMTP id g18mr2062712qbk; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 09:07:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.141.14 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Oct 2005 09:07:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <568753d90510020907j6c58192fv505d02ea68611b5f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 12:07:57 -0400 From: Enrique Rodriguez Reply-To: erodriguez@apache.org To: oscar-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: R4 Event Admin In-Reply-To: <433FF84B.2060804@imag.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <433FF84B.2060804@imag.fr> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 10/2/05, Didier Donsez wrote: > Noel J. Bergman a =E9crit : > > >Didier, > > > >I've asked BJ about whether or not you have to keep your code private un= til > >they publish R4. > > > >Since I haven't seen the OSGi event specification, how different are OSG= i > >Event Services from the COS Event Services from CORBA? > > > > > > > Hum, I am not familiar with the CORBA event service > but COS ES is (by nature) distributed and OSGi collocated in the same JVM > and COS ES event could be everything (datatype any) since OSGi events > are instances of a specified class > > I sumarize the OSGi Event Admin in the three slides available on > http://www-adele.imag.fr/~donsez/cours/osgi.pdf#page=3D100 > and Peter have presented it very quickly at the second meeting of the > OSGi Users Group France > http://www-adele.imag.fr/osgi/meeting2/OSGi-BasicArchitecture2.pdf#page= =3D47 > > One funny thing is the sentEvent method which is a synchronous event > delivery (114.7.1) > and this is not so trivial to implement (thanks you, Peter et al. ;-) ) > > Didier I am curious how this is related to the old (1996) Event Notification "implicit invocation" pattern. Event Manager Service certainly sounds similar, if not an exact implementation. http://www.riehle.org/computer-science/research/1996/tapos-1996-event.html Enrique