Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-oscar-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 15040 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2005 00:35:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Oct 2005 00:35:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 50006 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2005 00:35:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-oscar-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 49971 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2005 00:35:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact oscar-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: oscar-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list oscar-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 49960 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2005 00:35:22 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:35:22 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [194.119.192.3] (HELO mx1.isti.cnr.it) (194.119.192.3) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:35:28 -0700 Received: from conversionlocal.isti.cnr.it by mx.isti.cnr.it (PMDF V6.2-1x9 #31069) id <01LTNY97WUDSA9LF6D@mx.isti.cnr.it> for oscar-dev@incubator.apache.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 02:33:57 +0200 Received: from [151.80.0.14] by mx.isti.cnr.it (PMDF V6.2-1x9 #31069) with ESMTPA id <01LTNY8XY8BCA9LJ79@mx.isti.cnr.it> for oscar-dev@incubator.apache.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 02:33:57 +0200 Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 02:33:37 +0200 From: francesco furfari Subject: Re: R4 Road map? In-reply-to: <433DB164.4020401@ungoverned.org> To: oscar-dev@incubator.apache.org Message-id: <433DD961.8060409@isti.cnr.it> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-IP-SOURCE: 151.80.0.14 Auth Done References: <433DB164.4020401@ungoverned.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi all, a pragmatic approach ... is anybody planning to implement the Event Admin service? we are interested because now the UPnP Base Driver depends on it. francesco Richard S. Hall wrote: > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > >> Richard, >> >> >> >>> I am not saying that we are not interested in spec compliance, since I >>> think we would all like this. My point is that we have limited >>> resources >>> >> >> >> Felix is now a community project, so one focus should be on community >> building and actively growing the list of people contributing to the >> project. Putting together something like a matrix of features needed >> would >> help to in the process. > > > Agreed. Which is how this whole thread got started. It was suggested > that I create a road map of features that need to be implemented. I only > asked if I should differentiate between spec and non-spec issues. Whew! :-D > > I think BJ is a trouble maker. ;-) > >> We have people from IBM and elsewhere expressing >> interest. We should make it possible for them to participate with code >> contributions. >> > > I will let IBM'ers field this. > > -> richard >