Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 3355 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2005 03:23:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Oct 2005 03:23:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 69256 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2005 03:23:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-felix-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 69234 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2005 03:23:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact felix-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: felix-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list felix-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 69223 invoked by uid 99); 11 Oct 2005 03:23:30 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:23:30 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [62.79.155.212] (HELO cow.netcompartner.com) (62.79.155.212) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:23:32 -0700 Received: from [218.208.205.200] (helo=clt-5-150.netcompartner.com) by cow.netcompartner.com with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_MD5:16) (Exim 4.52) id 1EPAjJ-0000Hx-UJ for felix-dev@incubator.apache.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 05:23:06 +0200 From: Niclas Hedhman To: felix-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [jira] Created: (FELIX-8) Implement Log Service Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:23:01 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <742307201.1128777047713.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org> <200510082150.11808.niclas@apache.org> <434A7F2E.5090706@ungoverned.org> In-Reply-To: <434A7F2E.5090706@ungoverned.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200510111123.01463.niclas@hedhman.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Monday 10 October 2005 22:48, Richard S. Hall wrote: > If we end up with multiple implementations, we might > want to give them more colorful names that "Log Service" so in JIRA we > can differentiate the components Agree. "Log Service" should depict the 'provisioning contract', and not the provider itself. Cheers Niclas