Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-oscar-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31304 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2005 19:43:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Sep 2005 19:43:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 53611 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2005 19:43:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-oscar-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 53352 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2005 19:43:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact oscar-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: oscar-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list oscar-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 53336 invoked by uid 99); 30 Sep 2005 19:43:19 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:43:19 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of enriquer9@gmail.com designates 72.14.204.205 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.204.205] (HELO qproxy.gmail.com) (72.14.204.205) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:43:23 -0700 Received: by qproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o24so281qba for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:42:56 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:reply-to:organization:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=FTXTSUVU0DFJMLW1aIA83r7Y6Z1d5jq4ilzhvunaGvS5DrAa/QZb48/5zpvBKEAgMI/24wiq0WQ0MvuGZVztjlPWmZH+LoeO87iGNp2ZJwBaMhzgfSo2ZI5PLW33YdU7Ork6pP0RR9B57HAwDaI+wDWQKDO9cE0KsCZSf7la5rc= Received: by 10.65.112.5 with SMTP id p5mr1117885qbm; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:42:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.2? ( [66.30.206.209]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id e16sm1302653qbe.2005.09.30.12.42.55; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:42:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <433D94EA.4040401@apache.org> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 15:41:30 -0400 Reply-To: erodriguez@apache.org Organization: Apache Software Foundation User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: oscar-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: R4 Road map? References: <433D8111.80705@ungoverned.org> In-Reply-To: <433D8111.80705@ungoverned.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Enrique Rodriguez X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Richard S. Hall wrote: > Well, yes, if we want to claim to be 100% spec compliant... With JIRA you have the usual issue levels of blocker, major, minor, trivial, etc. You could use these in addition to a note stating the MUST, SHOULD, etc., level of spec compliance needed. Enrique > -> richard > > BJ Hargrave wrote: > >> But you do have the responsibility of specification compliance. If >> Felix wants to hold itself out to the public as an OSGi >> implementation, then it must implement all mandatory parts of the >> specification. You do not know who will be using Felix and, >> collectively, they will expect all mandatory parts of the spec to be >> implemented. >> >> BJ Hargrave >> Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM >> OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance >> hargrave@us.ibm.com >> Office: +1 407 849 9117 Mobile: +1 386 848 3788