Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-oscar-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16188 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2005 11:54:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Sep 2005 11:54:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 91870 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2005 11:54:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-oscar-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 91821 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2005 11:54:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact oscar-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: oscar-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list oscar-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 91795 invoked by uid 99); 28 Sep 2005 11:54:03 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 04:54:03 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [129.88.30.1] (HELO imag.imag.fr) (129.88.30.1) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 04:54:08 -0700 Received: from [129.88.103.2] (invite2.imag.fr [129.88.103.2]) by imag.imag.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j8SBrZjq016895 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:53:37 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <433A8446.4010408@ungoverned.org> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 07:53:42 -0400 From: "Richard S. Hall" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050720) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: oscar-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Running Felix in a servlet engine References: <433A5796.1010105@odoko.co.uk> <433A6494.1070801@ungoverned.org> <200509281912.40567.niclas@hedhman.org> In-Reply-To: <200509281912.40567.niclas@hedhman.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (imag.imag.fr [129.88.30.1]); Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:53:37 +0200 (CEST) X-IMAG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-IMAG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Niclas Hedhman wrote: >If ContainerY provides a extension mechanism, then we could create a solution >for ContainerY, without modifying ContainerY, thanks to the modularity of >OSGi itself. > > Certainly. However, I am not anticipating that many containers are written with extensible stream handler factories... >I don't think it is likely that generic solutions for the short term will be >feasible, mostly for political reasons. > Well, I will be happy to get one working that supports multiple OSGi framework instances...first things first. :-) -> richard