felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Kriens <Peter.Kri...@aQute.se>
Subject Re[2]: [oscar] Re: [OT] Wicket + OSGi
Date Fri, 09 Sep 2005 07:50:39 GMT
Wouldnt the war file be sufficient as config file?

Kind regards,

     Peter Kriens
     
NH> On Friday 09 September 2005 14:51, Peter Kriens wrote:
>> We call this the "extender" model and is used heavily in R4; for example
>> declarative services use this model. Features in R4 like
>> findEntryPaths, getResources, and loadClass are specifically added to
>> support this model.
>>
>> The advantage is that it significantly reduces the coding for the
>> application as well as making it more robust and easier to integrate with
>> other apps (less knowledge in the app bundle).

NH> Initially I was seeking to do a bundle that could be configured and what-not.

NH> At the end of the day, I backed off and said; "Hey, the configuration will be
NH> as complex as a tiny skeletal program..."

NH> Now, the coding this is a matter of minutes, and yes it will not bring you own
NH> little app up in seconds, but considering the typical time required to make
NH> something useful, I think the flexibility/insight outweighs the relatively
NH> low convenience (esp, since you then need to understand config files as
NH> well).

NH> That is not to mention that we would end up with yet another project to
NH> maintain, and have dependencies on and so forth...


NH> If you have some compelling evidence of benefits, I will re-evaluate these
NH> findings.


NH> Cheers
NH> Niclas


-- 
Peter Kriens                              Mob +33633746480
9C, Avenue St. Drézéry                    Tel +33467542167
34160 Beaulieu, France                    Tel +15123514821
                                          Tel +33870447986
AOL,Yahoo, Skype pkriens                  ICQ 255570717


Mime
View raw message