felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>
Subject Re: R4 Road map?
Date Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:16:49 GMT
Well, yes, if we want to claim to be 100% spec compliant...

-> richard

BJ Hargrave wrote:

>But you do have the responsibility of specification compliance. If Felix 
>wants to hold itself out to the public as an OSGi implementation, then it 
>must implement all mandatory parts of the specification. You do not know 
>who will be using Felix and, collectively, they will expect all mandatory 
>parts of the spec to be implemented.
>
>BJ Hargrave
>Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM
>OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance
>hargrave@us.ibm.com
>Office: +1 407 849 9117 Mobile: +1 386 848 3788
>
>"Richard S. Hall" <heavy@ungoverned.org> wrote on 2005-09-30 10:59:29 AM:
>
>  
>
>>I think marking them somehow would be worthwhile, but I am not 
>>necessarily saying they are more important than other tasks. If no one 
>>wanted a particular feature, it could be a waste of time to implement it 
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>if there are other tasks that people do want.
>>
>>-> richard
>>
>>BJ Hargrave wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>The should be clearly marked since spec compliance items must be done, 
>>>while the others are optional.
>>>
>>>BJ Hargrave
>>>Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM
>>>OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance
>>>hargrave@us.ibm.com
>>>Office: +1 407 849 9117 Mobile: +1 386 848 3788
>>>
>>>"Richard S. Hall" <heavy@ungoverned.org> wrote on 2005-09-30 10:41:18 
>>>      
>>>
>AM:
>  
>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Upayavira wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>Actually, it is probably easier than that. Just write a list of 
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>things 
>  
>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>>you'd like to do if you had an infinite amount of time, and add a few

>>>>>          
>>>>>
>
>  
>
>>>>>things you think you really _should_ do, if you could only feel 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>bothered.
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Sounds reasonable. I had already put a few things in JIRA previously.
>>>>
>>>>However, this list could get pretty long if I list everything in R4 
>>>>        
>>>>
>that 
>  
>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>needs to be done.
>>>>
>>>>There are basically two levels of tasks, spec compliance ones and ones 
>>>>        
>>>>
>
>  
>
>>>>that I would like to do to improve the design. I am not sure if these 
>>>>two should be differentiated in any way.
>>>>
>>>>-> richard
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>
>
>
>
>  
>

Mime
View raw message