felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Enrique Rodriguez <enriqu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Felix SVN trunk root
Date Fri, 26 Aug 2005 08:37:34 GMT
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Friday 26 August 2005 07:19, Richard S. Hall wrote:
>>If we really want to
>>draw a distinction, we could use 'r4-bundles' and 'bundles' or the
>>original suggestion.
> So the question is; Is it important??
> I think it is probably not important at all initially, since the numbers will 
> be small. But assuming that multiple implementations of the standard services 
> defined in the specification, and dozens of "unrelated" bundles, it could 
> make sense.
> However, other mechanisms could be employed and we can always adjust the 
> strategy in respect to svn layout about this later.
> I am +/-0 on either way.
> I otherwise agrees with Richards reasoning around why "optional" is not a good 
> name.

I agree.  Probably not an important distinction.  In an effort to avoid 
YAGNI (you aren't gonna need it) we should start with just "bundles."

And "optional" was not a good name choice on my part.


View raw message