felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Karasulu <aok...@bellsouth.net>
Subject Re: Maven-2 OSGi plugin
Date Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:11:56 GMT
Upayavira wrote:

> Richard S. Hall wrote:
>
>> Bennett, Timothy (JIS - Applications) wrote:
>>
>>> Terrific.  I'll work on getting my code committed sometime today.  I 
>>> may
>>> have some questions about package names the project has decided to use
>>> and other housekeeping stuff like that.
>>>
>>> I'm excited and honored to be part of this team.  Thanks for vote of
>>> confidence.  The work that Richard and his team have done so far on the
>>> OSGi spec and the Oscar implementation is really impressive.
>>>
>>
>> "My team" says, "Thanks." :-)
>>
>> Speaking of package names, I have started to go through and rename 
>> some packages in the Oscar source code. For example:
>>
>>    org.ungoverned ==> org.apache.osgi
>>    org.ungoverned.oscar ==> org.apache.osgi.framework
>>
>> The two above substitutions will pretty much tell you how every 
>> package is renamed in the current Oscar 2.0 code.
>>
>> I expect at some time we will also have:
>>
>>    org.apache.osgi.service
>>    org.apache.osgi.bundle
>>
>> Which will contain service definitions and bundle implementations, 
>> respectively.
>
>
> Just to be clear, you want to use the org.apache.osgi package, rather 
> than org.apache.oscar? IMO that would fit a bit better into Apache 
> package naming conventions, to the extent they exist.
>
> Thoughts?

org.apache.osgi is preferrable.

Alex


Mime
View raw message