Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5F2200BEC for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 12:23:26 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 0BF5C160B2D; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 11:23:26 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 5546D160B15 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 12:23:25 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 50723 invoked by uid 500); 29 Dec 2016 11:23:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@falcon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@falcon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@falcon.apache.org Received: (qmail 50707 invoked by uid 99); 29 Dec 2016 11:23:24 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 11:23:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id CA996C084D for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 11:23:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.898 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EUiRG1JjU6we for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 11:23:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wj0-f175.google.com (mail-wj0-f175.google.com [209.85.210.175]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 8E9275F1AE for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 11:23:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wj0-f175.google.com with SMTP id v7so356585347wjy.2 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 03:23:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=uxDSyHvnIEMoRP2KCxO/KxC3pqqEgtK3+MviiIMo/5o=; b=oOEPLWeIFvTnTvoUJNW7u3jSwNonYm4d9BbRwNiOU8VNASbwu5lqWYOby7DFNC6U2I itmKdiTMk2YcZOLU2QSaxWvImfmUYeRW2zCnEWT1a89E4GzfxJrcsfpLU0R6lzWP6Q6Z bVdB0ZgCnNxtaxtjE5iLGZxPJti9Ui+ekeVmLwTK681FvHAVJ2JKWRjSZuGvHQG2WID5 L1Wt1iHxTKh88JkOJhuatuIA2PovW3aY9tFZal9taX5QeSD1/z8fXMG6HVoU+/LizD1E i/2SeSMTvxx1D8yNNM7EZdTM8rhdk1kRq8TcWUWDWnn+qJhn0j2l4QmS024Xa0Z3ZO0I c90A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=uxDSyHvnIEMoRP2KCxO/KxC3pqqEgtK3+MviiIMo/5o=; b=rFQYZW0api2raYNkiMvGpFC3ZicjHTofJ00Szs2g+ZiLaED88uGkV1c+bVX0aAyy5x rN7VCqESxdokEriyk1rIOdHA24PMrjuZbV0H619fGjxBGir4kILYGp76tW1tPwGHgyOg fdiUvA8fL1Qf38jVhO98KVEiqE8pAkZofMJxeozZKR/e/ygkYU0fj3CDUAMO2U29++ME tPRaC8ASFS+aqAWGYvBrkPHbNQn/wVLuddtkrFROTFMTYUMt6KsqVbNYlVP35zUgeGeS pRwu7i33kbtmHwgBP+Gu547h7QUKC9zZdLQDKmfzagijRjI8CtpsstoJvf0aADKxdZTI GAEg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIg8Kh5ro4+0bWNndjoTVjdSltyDuX4IjrIpN1gKE1uCNMqL3o0ADAuGGbyPnvYDZ3jnO7qCvsw369cDg== X-Received: by 10.194.147.105 with SMTP id tj9mr33793895wjb.17.1483010593529; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 03:23:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.146.144 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 03:23:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Sandeep Samudrala Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 16:53:12 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Squashing commits before git push To: dev@falcon.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e011778cfa023860544ca4f31 archived-at: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 11:23:26 -0000 --089e011778cfa023860544ca4f31 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Makes sense. On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Pallavi Rao wrote: > While creating a PR, we tend to push the local commits as is when we do a > git push into the forked repo. These local commits include lot of merge > commits, and intermediate commits. This makes it hard to review, when some > changes have been requested (as the reviewer has to either look at changes > made to each commit, or re-review the whole patch). > > Would like to request contributors to squash the new commits into one > before they do a git push, so, all your intermediate changes go in as one > commit. Basically, resulting 1 commit per update to PR. > > > Thoughts? > > -- > _____________________________________________________________ > The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the > use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others > authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged > information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance > on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be > unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify > us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your > system. The firm is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission > of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its > receipt. > --089e011778cfa023860544ca4f31--