Mailing-List: contact dev-help@falcon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@falcon.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Falcon 1.0
To: dev@falcon.apache.org
References: <CANxGrr5L4rUD-QgOLFKR3EtcNsTL9QfWQVPtxd6L7jvdbqH4fw@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jean-Baptiste_Onofr=c3=a9?= <jb@nanthrax.net>
Message-ID: <1c10eee2-0337-89f9-3add-573cb8aaca29@nanthrax.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 07:22:02 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CANxGrr5L4rUD-QgOLFKR3EtcNsTL9QfWQVPtxd6L7jvdbqH4fw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
archived-at: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 05:22:18 -0000

+1

It makes sense to prepare 1.0 release.

Regards
JB

On 09/01/2016 04:55 PM, Ajay Yadava wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Now that 0.10 has been successfully released, thanks to heroic efforts of
> Balu, I think it is time to start discussion on our long pending 1.0
> release :) I specifically want to discuss the following items.
>
> *Scope / Change Threshold for calling it 1.0*
>
> We need to decide on the bare minimum changes to call it 1.0  I know at
> least 2 views on this in the community
>
>    1. First view is that 1.0 is all about API stability, Once we have
>    stabilized the existing API, we can call it 1.0. There are already some
>    changes committed to trunk like a new shell, moving post processing to
>    server side, REST API Revamp and some more lifecycle changes which will
>    definitely come in 1.0 This should be enough to do a meaningful 1.0 release.
>    2. Another view is that we need to have lot of marketable features and
>    new capabilities to call it 1.0 so that we can publicize it enough and ask
>    audience to reconsider falcon even if they found Apache Falcon short for
>    their use cases.
>
> Please chime in with your thoughts :)
>
>
> *Call for Volunteer*
>
> As discussed in last developer sync up, Pragya communicated to me that she
> has very high work load at her office and will not be able to take out time
> for release activities. If there are any committers who haven't yet done a
> release and want to volunteer for 1.0, then please reply to this thread,
> else I will assume the role of Release Manager for 1.0. Many release
> activities require karma available only to committers, hence only
> committers can volunteer.
>
>
> Regards
> Ajay Yadava
>

-- 
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com