falcon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ajay Yadava (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Comment Edited] (FALCON-2141) Bump up pom to 1.0
Date Tue, 06 Sep 2016 05:36:20 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-2141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15466470#comment-15466470
] 

Ajay Yadava edited comment on FALCON-2141 at 9/6/16 5:35 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------

I suspect you are using the backward compatibility as criterion to call certain features as
1.0 features. This is not the case as per my understanding. In fact the key feature, API Stability,
itself needs to be backward compatible, IMO.

I am looking more from a view point of patch release with critical bug fixes(0.10.1), and
one feature release which happens to be 1.0 because it contains API stability. However, it
seems from  [~sandeep.samudrala] and your comments that you are suggesting a parallel feature
branch along with 1.0. If you go through the email for 1.0 this is opposite in spirit, to
many of the proposals for 1.0 (e.g. reasons to do it in master / reasons to reduce the scope)

If the intention is to run 2 parallel branch lines of falcon then I suggest you please pitch
the same with the details on the discussion thread for 1.0. Personally, I have lot of concerns
in that approach but I would like to hear your thoughts on the plan and reason for taking
that route.

Edit: forks -> branch lines


was (Author: ajayyadava):
I suspect you are using the backward compatibility as criterion to call certain features as
1.0 features. This is not the case as per my understanding. In fact the key feature, API Stability,
itself needs to be backward compatible, IMO.

I am looking more from a view point of patch release with critical bug fixes(0.10.1), and
one feature release which happens to be 1.0 because it contains API stability. However, it
seems from  [~sandeep.samudrala] and your comments that you are suggesting a parallel feature
branch along with 1.0. If you go through the email for 1.0 this is opposite in spirit, to
many of the proposals for 1.0 (e.g. reasons to do it in master / reasons to reduce the scope)

If the intention is to run 2 parallel forks of falcon then I suggest you please pitch the
same with the details on the discussion thread for 1.0. Personally, I have lot of concerns
in that approach but I would like to hear your thoughts on the plan and reason for taking
that route.



> Bump up pom to 1.0
> ------------------
>
>                 Key: FALCON-2141
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-2141
>             Project: Falcon
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Ajay Yadava
>            Assignee: Ajay Yadava
>             Fix For: 1.0
>
>
> As discussed in an earlier dev-sync up, we will do development for 1.0 in master. This
JIRA is to update the poms in the project to 1.0 instead of 0.11



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message