Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-18091-apmail-falcon-dev-archive=falcon.apache.org@falcon.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-falcon-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-falcon-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C84E618696
	for <apmail-falcon-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:41:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 72085 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2015 19:41:50 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-falcon-dev-archive@falcon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 72037 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2015 19:41:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@falcon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@falcon.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@falcon.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@falcon.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.falcon.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@falcon.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@falcon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 72026 invoked by uid 99); 18 Dec 2015 19:41:50 -0000
Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:41:50 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org)
 with ESMTP id 343D31A13A6
	for <dev@falcon.apache.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:41:50 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.226
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.226 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31
	tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01,
	RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.554] autolearn=disabled
Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8])
	by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new,
 port 10024)
	with ESMTP id XUp-9bDPyz_R for <dev@falcon.apache.org>;
	Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:41:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with
 SMTP id F068E203BF
	for <dev@falcon.incubator.apache.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:41:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 71674 invoked by uid 99); 18 Dec 2015 19:41:47 -0000
Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:41:47 +0000
Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD34C2C1F72
	for <dev@falcon.incubator.apache.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:41:46 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:41:46 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Pragya Mittal (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@falcon.incubator.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12923113.1450467445000.70917.1450467706706@Atlassian.JIRA>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12923113.1450467445000@Atlassian.JIRA>
References: <JIRA.12923113.1450467445000@Atlassian.JIRA>
 <JIRA.12923113.1450467445257@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Updated] (FALCON-1675) Lifecycle stage is not honoured when
 only cluster level lifecycle is implemented.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-1675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Pragya Mittal updated FALCON-1675:
----------------------------------
    Description: 
In case of feed lifecycle :
If we define lifecycle at cluster level and global level lifecycle is not defined, instead of honouring lifecycle at cluster level it falls back to old retention level.

Feed definition is :
{noformat}
<feed name="RetentionLifecycleTest-inPath-eeb77a18" description="clicks log" xmlns="uri:falcon:feed:0.1">
    <frequency>hours(1)</frequency>
    <timezone>UTC</timezone>
    <late-arrival cut-off="hours(1)"/>
    <clusters>
        <cluster name="RetentionLifecycleTest-corp-02f1746f" type="source">
            <validity start="2015-12-18T18:48Z" end="2015-12-18T20:48Z"/>
            <retention limit="hours(10)" action="delete"/>
            <lifecycle>
                <retention-stage>
                    <frequency>hours(3)</frequency>
                    <queue>default</queue>
                    <priority>LOW</priority>
                    <properties>
                        <property name="retention.policy.agebaseddelete.limit" value="hours(4)"/>
                    </properties>
                </retention-stage>
            </lifecycle>
        </cluster>
    </clusters>
    <locations>
        <location type="data" path="/tmp/falcon-regression/RetentionLifecycleTest/testFolders/${YEAR}/${MONTH}/${DAY}/${HOUR}"/>
        <location type="stats" path="/projects/falcon/clicksStats"/>
        <location type="meta" path="/projects/falcon/clicksMetaData"/>
    </locations>
    <ACL owner="pragya.mittal" group="dataqa" permission="*"/>
    <schema location="/schema/clicks" provider="protobuf"/>
    <properties/>
</feed>
{noformat}

Job has 
retention frequency = 360min (6 hours)
priority = NORMAL
Intsnace retains last 10 instances instead of 4 (as is defined in cluster level lifecycle)

  was:
In case of feed lifecycle :
If we define lifecycle at cluster level and global level lifecycle is not defined, instead of honouring lifecycle at cluster level it falls back to old retention level.


> Lifecycle stage is not honoured when only cluster level lifecycle is implemented.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FALCON-1675
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-1675
>             Project: Falcon
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: feed
>    Affects Versions: 0.9
>         Environment: QA
>            Reporter: Pragya Mittal
>
> In case of feed lifecycle :
> If we define lifecycle at cluster level and global level lifecycle is not defined, instead of honouring lifecycle at cluster level it falls back to old retention level.
> Feed definition is :
> {noformat}
> <feed name="RetentionLifecycleTest-inPath-eeb77a18" description="clicks log" xmlns="uri:falcon:feed:0.1">
>     <frequency>hours(1)</frequency>
>     <timezone>UTC</timezone>
>     <late-arrival cut-off="hours(1)"/>
>     <clusters>
>         <cluster name="RetentionLifecycleTest-corp-02f1746f" type="source">
>             <validity start="2015-12-18T18:48Z" end="2015-12-18T20:48Z"/>
>             <retention limit="hours(10)" action="delete"/>
>             <lifecycle>
>                 <retention-stage>
>                     <frequency>hours(3)</frequency>
>                     <queue>default</queue>
>                     <priority>LOW</priority>
>                     <properties>
>                         <property name="retention.policy.agebaseddelete.limit" value="hours(4)"/>
>                     </properties>
>                 </retention-stage>
>             </lifecycle>
>         </cluster>
>     </clusters>
>     <locations>
>         <location type="data" path="/tmp/falcon-regression/RetentionLifecycleTest/testFolders/${YEAR}/${MONTH}/${DAY}/${HOUR}"/>
>         <location type="stats" path="/projects/falcon/clicksStats"/>
>         <location type="meta" path="/projects/falcon/clicksMetaData"/>
>     </locations>
>     <ACL owner="pragya.mittal" group="dataqa" permission="*"/>
>     <schema location="/schema/clicks" provider="protobuf"/>
>     <properties/>
> </feed>
> {noformat}
> Job has 
> retention frequency = 360min (6 hours)
> priority = NORMAL
> Intsnace retains last 10 instances instead of 4 (as is defined in cluster level lifecycle)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)