Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-15508-apmail-falcon-dev-archive=falcon.apache.org@falcon.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-falcon-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-falcon-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D37ED18B83
	for <apmail-falcon-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:20:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 28916 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2015 04:20:05 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-falcon-dev-archive@falcon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 28878 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2015 04:20:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@falcon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@falcon.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@falcon.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@falcon.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.falcon.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@falcon.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@falcon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 28866 invoked by uid 99); 30 Sep 2015 04:20:05 -0000
Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:20:05 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org)
 with ESMTP id 472F318099C
	for <dev@falcon.apache.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:20:05 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.974
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.974 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31
	tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006] autolearn=disabled
Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8])
	by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new,
 port 10024)
	with ESMTP id hvxWYV9u6j7S for <dev@falcon.apache.org>;
	Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:20:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with
 SMTP id 9448E20FFE
	for <dev@falcon.incubator.apache.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:20:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 28601 invoked by uid 99); 30 Sep 2015 04:20:04 -0000
Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:20:04 +0000
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:20:04 +0000 (UTC)
From: "sandeep samudrala (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@falcon.incubator.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12901415.1443558380000.109863.1443586804433@Atlassian.JIRA>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12901415.1443558380000@Atlassian.JIRA>
References: <JIRA.12901415.1443558380000@Atlassian.JIRA>
 <JIRA.12901415.1443558380506@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (FALCON-1499) Lifecycle Retention Issues
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-1499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14936346#comment-14936346 ] 

sandeep samudrala commented on FALCON-1499:
-------------------------------------------

[~ajayyadava] : Can you link the review board entry?.
+        controls.setConcurrency("1"); 
It might cause issue in case of one instance getting hanged for some reason and retention will not work at all. 
Set it atleast to 2. 

+        String queue = retentionStage.getQueue() == null ? "default" : retentionStage.getQueue();

Why default? if feedLevel property ( <property name="queueName") is defined, shouldn't that be honored?


> Lifecycle Retention Issues
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: FALCON-1499
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-1499
>             Project: Falcon
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ajay Yadava
>            Assignee: Ajay Yadava
>         Attachments: FALCON-1499.patch
>
>
> Two issues:
> 1) Some properties were missing from startup.properties
> 2) NullPointerException when queueName and priority are not specified in retentionStage.
> Originally reported by [~pragya.mittal].



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)