falcon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Srikanth Sundarrajan (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (FALCON-206) Process update for wf changes
Date Mon, 30 Dec 2013 07:30:52 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13858631#comment-13858631

Srikanth Sundarrajan commented on FALCON-206:

Can you post this on review board, Have few comments and would prefer to post them inline
with the statements

> Process update for wf changes
> -----------------------------
>                 Key: FALCON-206
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-206
>             Project: Falcon
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Shwetha G S
>            Assignee: Shwetha G S
>             Fix For: 0.5
>         Attachments: FALCON-206-v1.patch, FALCON-206.patch
> Updating a process for adding another input requires updating process definition(add
input) and oozie wf(to handle new input). When oozie wf is updated, all instances take the
new definition. Re-running an old instance also uses the  new wf definition, but the wf will
fail as the new input is not defined for old instances.
> To solve this, the wf and the lib should be copied to a staging directory with every
process updatte

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message