Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-excalibur-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 67935 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2007 10:13:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2007 10:13:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 5272 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2007 10:13:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-excalibur-dev-archive@excalibur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5180 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2007 10:13:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@excalibur.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: "Excalibur Developers List" Reply-To: "Excalibur Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@excalibur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5159 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2007 10:13:25 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 03:13:24 -0700 Received: (qmail 67681 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2007 10:11:21 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?IPv6:::1?) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Mar 2007 10:11:21 -0000 Message-ID: <4603A7C8.2030003@apache.org> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 11:11:20 +0100 From: Carsten Ziegeler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Excalibur Developers List Subject: Re: OS differences in source resolving References: <46027F4B.20506@apache.org> <46038DCC.3050907@apache.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Joerg Heinicke wrote: > Carsten Ziegeler writes: > >> Do I understand this right that we could check if "file:" is followed by >> just one slash and then add the second one? > > For this particular problem yes. But one of the comments cited by Jorg said JDK > 1.3 implementation is just too broken. I don't know if you want to use runtime > Java version checks, so that you can use File.toURI().toAsciiString() as > recommended for Java 1.4+. > Yes, I saw that - I don't think that this is worth the effort. I think we should update to JDK 1.4 with upcoming versions anyway and then change this code. Thanks Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@excalibur.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@excalibur.apache.org