Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-excalibur-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 20704 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2007 02:53:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jan 2007 02:53:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 50257 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jan 2007 02:53:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-excalibur-dev-archive@excalibur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50206 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jan 2007 02:53:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@excalibur.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: "Excalibur Developers List" Reply-To: "Excalibur Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@excalibur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50195 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jan 2007 02:53:43 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:53:43 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [207.7.108.203] (HELO cardero.textdrive.com) (207.7.108.203) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:53:33 -0800 Received: from j-aaron-farrs-powerbook58.local (n28z28l125.broadband.ctm.net [125.31.28.125]) by cardero.textdrive.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26DC6BA463 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 02:53:10 +0000 (GMT) To: "Excalibur Developers List" Subject: Re: svn commit: r492447 References: <20070104083119.5FED01A981C@eris.apache.org> <45B605AE.5010800@apache.org> <26A8908B-FE8E-48B8-9CAD-9D3E8F91FD1C@leosimons.com> <45B9B9A6.2010605@apache.org> <70369C5B-C416-42C4-9D97-68F10B8C2959@leosimons.com> From: J Aaron Farr Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:53:05 +0800 In-Reply-To: <70369C5B-C416-42C4-9D97-68F10B8C2959@leosimons.com> (Leo Simons's message of "Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:55:09 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Leo Simons writes: > On Jan 26, 2007, at 10:36 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote: >>>> Well, let's see if we reach agreement, first :) >>>> >>> So, I think: removing "implements Component" from the interface, but >>> leave it/add it to the implementation for compatiblity. >>> >>> Fine with everyone? >> >> I think POJO is a bad term that is readily abused. That said, I've >> never liked the marker interface and wouldn't mind seeing it go. >> We'd need to test everything of course. And if we're going to go >> that far then maybe I'll finally work on making sure all the >> components properly run in OSGi environments too. > > Well, especially if Aaron is gonna do the testing, a very > enthousiastic +1! I'm not promising how quick it will happen. I'm bouncing all over China right now and my time and internet connection is sporadic. Should settle down by the end of February though (hopefully won't take that long though). -- jaaron --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@excalibur.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@excalibur.apache.org