excalibur-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stephen McConnell" <mcconn...@dpml.net>
Subject RE: A question regaring Avalon context mappings from Merlin to Avalon
Date Mon, 10 Oct 2005 17:14:24 GMT
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Siegfried Goeschl [mailto:siegfried.goeschl@it20one.at] 
> Sent: Tuesday, 11 October 2005 12:34 AM
> To: Excalibur Developers List
> Subject: A question regaring Avalon context mappings from 
> Merlin to Avalon
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> looking at
> 
> +) http://wiki.apache.org/avalon/AvalonStandards
> +) http://wiki.apache.org/avalon/AvalonContextSurvey
> 
> there is a mismatch regarding
> 
> +) urn:avalon:partition ==> component.id or component.logger
> +) urn:avalon:name ==> component.logger or component.id
> 
> Is there any definite answer?

The partition name was the namespace within which 'name' values were unique,
For example a partition named "root/http/context" combined with a component
name "pump-handler" can be combined to form the absolute component path
"root/http/context/pump-handler".

The combination of partition and name results in a unique reference for a
deployment scenario and would be an appropriate name for a logging channel
for all components sharing the same path (keeping in mind that there exists
the possibility for multiple component instances within a given path
relative to the lifestyle of the target component (singleton == 1, thread =
n, transient = n).

/Steve.

--------------------------
Stephen McConnell
mailto:mcconnell@dpml.net
http://www.dpml.net


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@excalibur.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@excalibur.apache.org


Mime
View raw message