excalibur-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Berin Loritsch <blorit...@d-haven.org>
Subject Re: svn commit: r233023 - /excalibur/trunk/containerkit/lifecycle/impl/project.xml
Date Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:07:43 GMT
Shash Chatterjee wrote:

> Berin,
>
>> Yep.  The project.xml for those files are set up using 
>> <id>excalibur-pool-api</id> as opposed to the groupId/artifactId 
>> pairing.  All I did was make everything build for me.
>>
>> It was a mess just trying to get everything to work just so I could 
>> build the docs for the SourceResolver package because those JavaDocs 
>> are missing from the website.
>
> Yes, I see what you mean about the "<id>" element.  Even, with that 
> though, it built/deployed fine for me on both Windows and Linux (using 
> Maven-1.0.2). The shared ../project-common.xml does define the 
> <groupId> correctly.  Looks like this pattern is used for all the 
> directories/modules, not just for excalibur-pool/lifecycle.
>
> Wonder why it worked one way for me and another for you!  Anybody else 
> have any idea on how it should work?


Maven 1.1 should have something to do with it.  It might be stricter 
about the <id> vs. the groupId/artifactId split.

Instead of defining <id> in those project.xmls, use <artifactId> so that 
it will respect it properly in all versions.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@excalibur.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@excalibur.apache.org


Mime
View raw message