Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-excalibur-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 18721 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2005 19:54:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jun 2005 19:54:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 43988 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2005 19:54:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-excalibur-dev-archive@excalibur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43947 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2005 19:54:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@excalibur.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: "Excalibur Developers List" Reply-To: "Excalibur Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@excalibur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43934 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2005 19:54:28 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of hammett@uol.com.br designates 200.221.4.195 as permitted sender) Received: from smtpout4.uol.com.br (HELO smtp.uol.com.br) (200.221.4.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:54:27 -0700 Received: from powermachine (unknown [200.169.131.250]) by scorpion4.uol.com.br (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F4E38BC9 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:26:42 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: <001001c57340$313f2450$4f6401c7@powermachine> From: "hammett" To: "Excalibur Developers List" References: <000d01c5722e$31ee2580$0200000a@powermachine> <61328.136.2.1.101.1118914565.squirrel@webmail.paiwastoon.com.af> <000f01c5727a$b2fe8b50$4f6401c7@powermachine> <42B1FBFF.2090504@d-haven.org> Subject: Re: [Not yet a proposal]: Excalibur Container Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:26:37 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hey Berin, ----- Original Message ----- From: "Berin Loritsch" > I think the best aspect of what I did was to be DI flavor of the week > agnostic. I intentionally developed a system that would allow Spring > style components, Avalon style components, and PicoContainer style > components all live peacefully together. I'm all for that too! +1 > I was in the process of incorporating security into the model, and that > resulted in the J5Sec project. I think I have yet to incorporate it in to > the Dojo suite. It is imperative that a Dojo that uses remote components > has a robust security model. One of the strenghts of Castle Microkernel is that it is only focused in being a inversion of control container. Anything else comes in the form of facilities - yes the word was borrowed from merlin. This approach lead us to a small code base, easy to grasp and more focused on extensions points. The challenge that arises is how to compose extensions, chaining them, but that was also nicely addressed in castle microkernel eventually :-) > Add to that my really simple configuration tool that I have been working > on for a different project, and you can see where this is going. Granted > I'm only one guy doing all this. And what do you think? Shall we start our little monster experimentation from there or start a new monster altogether? ;-) I'd rather go with a new thing, just because I - and possible others - need to grasp the Java 1.5 from the start... :-\ -- Cheers, hammett http://www.castleproject.org/~hammett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@excalibur.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@excalibur.apache.org