excalibur-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vadim Gritsenko <va...@reverycodes.com>
Subject Re: Release excalibur-logger, -pool, -component...
Date Thu, 07 Apr 2005 15:17:46 GMT
Sasvata (Shash) Chatterjee wrote:
>> Is there any backward incompatibility problems with 4.2, as related to 
>> 4.1.5?
>> If 4.2 is compatible with 4.1.5, I have no issues with that plan. If 
>> not, I'd suggest either to release bunch of components compiled 
>> against older stable version, and/or ensure that 4.2 is compatible 
>> with 4.1.5.
> I don't know.

Actually, the changes are fairly minimal. Attached is the cleaned up diff (I 
removed license switch, changes in test/ directory, and some cosmetic changes) - 
it's failry small.

So, I do not have any objections to base all releases on the framework 4.2 release.


>  On Keel, we too are on 4.1.5.  I can try rolling all the 
> components back to 4.1.5 and see if all the tests run (assuming 
> everything compiles), and I agree that would be a good baseline to 
> start.  In theory, the second field changing means 4.2.x should be 
> backward-compatible with 4.1.x, I don't know what will happen in 
> practice. We can then turn around and baseline on 4.2 right after that, 
> so we can see the changes between 4.1.5.  Of course, somebody might pipe 
> up and tell us before that :-)
> Shash

View raw message