Mailing-List: contact dev-help@excalibur.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Excalibur Developers List" <dev@excalibur.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Semantic bug in Framework?
From: Alex Karasulu <aok123@bellsouth.net>
To: Avalon Developers List <dev@avalon.apache.org>
Cc: dev@excalibur.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <200407291558.08802.niclas@hedhman.org>
References: <200407291458.05310.niclas@hedhman.org>
	 <200407291503.38163.niclas@hedhman.org>
	 <f41e0a0504072900537a9f7c04@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200407291558.08802.niclas@hedhman.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1091109808.4354.2.camel@fermi.trunk.joshua-tree.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:03:34 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 03:58, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Thursday 29 July 2004 15:53, Leo Sutic wrote:
> > That's a bug in ConfigurationUtils.equals.
> >
> > Child order ***is*** significant.

Absolutely order should be relavent.  Some components depend on the
ordering of elements within a configuration.  Hence equals should
consider element order.

> I was hoping for that, but since someone spent a lot of time taking order out 
> of the equation, I suspected the worst.
> 
> Since you seems very confident, I'll start with re-implementing a proper 
> equals() / hashCode() for DefaultConfiguration.

+1

Alex


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@excalibur.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@excalibur.apache.org
Apache Excalibur Project -- URL: http://excalibur.apache.org/