Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-excalibur-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 75763 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2004 23:41:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2004 23:41:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 31546 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2004 23:41:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-excalibur-dev-archive@excalibur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31509 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2004 23:41:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@excalibur.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: List-Id: "Excalibur Developers List" Reply-To: "Excalibur Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@excalibur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31494 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2004 23:41:16 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [200.221.11.59] (HELO smtp.uol.com.br) (200.221.11.59) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:41:13 -0700 Received: from keldorfortress (200-98-4-208.tlf.dialuol.com.br [200.98.4.208]) by scorpion6.uol.com.br (Postfix) with SMTP id 442598DAE for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 20:40:47 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: <006601c46545$0c27a4d0$d00462c8@keldorfortress> From: "hammett" To: "Excalibur Developers List" References: <20040708222133.48086.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> <40EDD3BC.6050405@realityforge.org> Subject: Re: Attribute toolkit? Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 20:41:09 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Donald" > It looks like you are writing a runtime attribute toolkit. > Have you considered using one of the existing ones such as > metaclass? This is the one we use over at loom. That could be nice, but I only extended the qdox usage while at the same time allowed people to use another meta implementation like commons-attributes or other. It was based on a very old suggestion from LSD http://www.jroller.com/comments/lsd?anchor=rethinking_attributes The good think is that fortress will enable attributes to be used by component developers. Cheers, hammett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@excalibur.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@excalibur.apache.org Apache Excalibur Project -- URL: http://excalibur.apache.org/