Mailing-List: contact dev-help@excalibur.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Excalibur Developers List" <dev@excalibur.apache.org>
From: "Carsten Ziegeler" <cziegeler@s-und-n.de>
To: "'Excalibur Developers List'" <dev@excalibur.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [RT] About proxies and pooling
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 15:37:42 +0200
Organization: S&N AG
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <07258F4244D6F649B1A78993D070B7CA01EDA8D0@ACSPMXE02>
Thread-Index: AcRatpE2WrmvcuO1RoSmcaDqpaYBaAAApnbw
Message-ID: <OFA2142E76.EBA95A3C-ONC1256EBE.0049FC25@sundn.de>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"

Hamilton Verissimo de Oliveira wrote:
> 
> Hello, dude!
> 
> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziegeler@s-und-n.de]
> 
> > Is it this way? If so, I wouldn't understand the 
> performance problem 
> > :)
> 
> Nevertheless, dude, is there anything better than give the 
> user the blessing of choice? :-)
> 
> If he wants proxy benefits, he can turn it on - or in my view 
> use an extended container - if he doesn't, well, use the 
> simplest container. I think the keel's guys pointed out good 
> arguments for that strategy.
> 
Sure, freedom of choice is most often good - but might lead
to end in an FS (flexibility syndrom).
But ok, I understand this and let's see if we can make our container
better customizable.
But we should make sure that our simplest version of the container
(without any extension) has more value over a simple map :)

Carsten


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@excalibur.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@excalibur.apache.org
Apache Excalibur Project -- URL: http://excalibur.apache.org/