Mailing-List: contact dev-help@excalibur.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Excalibur Developers List" <dev@excalibur.apache.org>
Message-ID: <40DA0799.9080100@realityforge.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:43:37 +1000
From: Peter Donald <peter@realityforge.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Excalibur Developers List <dev@excalibur.apache.org>
Subject: Re: i18n Deprecation
References: <07258F4244D6F649B1A78993D070B7CA01E450DA@ACSPMXE02>
 <40D99A92.9080102@tanukisoftware.com>
In-Reply-To: <40D99A92.9080102@tanukisoftware.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

> I too am wondering what the benefits of salt are over i18n.   I make 
> heavy use of it
> in most applications that I have/am developing.  Switching is not out of 
> the question.
> But it would burn some time, especially if the apis are different.   I 
> would just want
> to make sure it is worth it.

There is no real benefit other than the fact that salt is actively 
supported. It has better unit test coverage but other than that and 
works slightly better in servlet style environments but other than that 
there is no real change.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@excalibur.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@excalibur.apache.org
Apache Excalibur Project -- URL: http://excalibur.apache.org/