Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-112-apmail-excalibur-dev-archive=excalibur.apache.org@excalibur.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-excalibur-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 26120 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2004 13:53:52 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jun 2004 13:53:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 28278 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2004 13:53:56 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-excalibur-dev-archive@excalibur.apache.org
Received: (qmail 28234 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2004 13:53:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@excalibur.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@excalibur.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@excalibur.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:dev@excalibur.apache.org>
List-Id: "Excalibur Developers List" <dev.excalibur.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Excalibur Developers List" <dev@excalibur.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@excalibur.apache.org
Received: (qmail 28216 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2004 13:53:54 -0000
Received: from [220.110.69.218] (HELO tanukisoftware.com) (220.110.69.218)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 06:53:54 -0700
Received: from tanukisoftware.com (127.0.0.1)
	by localhost (127.0.0.1) with [XMail 1.9 (Win32/Ix86) ESMTP Server]
	id <SC9A> for <dev@excalibur.apache.org> from <leiflists@tanukisoftware.com>;
	Thu, 17 Jun 2004 22:45:22 +0900
Message-ID: <40D0EFE5.7030001@tanukisoftware.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 10:12:05 +0900
From: Leif Mortenson <leiflists@tanukisoftware.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4
X-Accept-Language: en, ja, en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Excalibur Developers List <dev@excalibur.apache.org>
Subject: Instrument Manager package.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Hi all,
Still trying to come up to speed with SVN, but thanks for all the work
getting things moved over.

I was doing to start digging in and working on the Instrument packages.
But it looks like the Instrument Manager directory has been reworked.
This was done in the Avalon repository but I was wondering what the
thinking here is. Currently the maven build does not work as it appears
to still expect the source files to all be in the same directory. I can
fix it
but I want to make sure I am on the same page.

Also it looks like the pool and thread packages have been broken up into
instrumented and uninstrumented copies of the components. Is this really
necessary? I fear that the two will quickly diverge and become a
maintenance nightmare. If a user does not wish to use instrumentation
then all they need to do is include the instrument jar, which is extremely
small. I think it would be wise to get rid of the uninstrumented versions
and go back to only having one copy of the source. This is akin to creating
a version of the classes which do not do logging... Thoughts?

Cheers,
Leif


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@excalibur.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@excalibur.apache.org
Apache Excalibur Project -- URL: http://excalibur.apache.org/