Mailing-List: contact etch-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jadixson@cisco.com designates
 171.71.176.117 as permitted sender)
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.15.0.081119
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 11:34:48 -0600
Subject: Re: [vote] Release 1.0.2
From: James Dixson <jadixson@cisco.com>
To: <etch-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Message-ID: <C5B5C558.22FC2%jadixson@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [vote] Release 1.0.2
Thread-Index: AcmK3LRZ8W+chnDkvUmCGlJhTBHeaQ==
In-Reply-To: <4990666E.2070409@cisco.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

Ok. I will update the READMEs and add the missing .txt files and respin.


On 2/9/09 11:22 AM, "Scott Comer (sccomer)" <sccomer@cisco.com> wrote:

> inline.
> 
> James Dixson wrote:
>> 
>> On 2/9/09 10:56 AM, "Scott Comer (sccomer)" <sccomer@cisco.com> wrote:
>> 
>>   
>>> the README.txt has problems:
>>> 
>>> 1) the eclipse howto is gone.
>>> 
>>>     
>> 
>> There is no Eclipse howto for using Etch, only an Eclipse howto for building
>> the Etch source. That content was moved to BUILD.txt an is part of the
>> source distribution.
>>   
> roger.
>>   
>>> 2) the top level directory structure is:
>>> 
>>> ChangeLog.txt  LICENSE.txt  README.txt  bin  examples  lib  maven
>>> uninst.exe
>>> 
>>>     
>> 
>> For the windows binary install, yes it is. Is there a problem?
>>   
> NOTICE.txt is missing. ReleaseNotes.txt is missing. uninst.exe is not
> listed. examples is not listed.
>>   
>>> 3) the release notes are gone.
>>> 
>>>     
>> 
>> They exist in the source distribution but not in the binary distro. I will
>> add them to the binary and respin.
>> 
>>   
>>> 4) the path for ETCH_HOME is wrong.
>>> 
>>>     
>> 
>> Do you mean the one set by the windows installer? It is setting ETCH_HOME to
>> the installation path as it should.
>>   
> most of these problems were about the readme. the path as documented in
> the readme is wrong.
>>  
>>   
>>> 5) the etch installer name is wrong.
>>> 
>>>     
>> 
>> How is it wrong. "Apache-etch-1.0.2-incubating-setup.exe" is what it is.
>>   
> in the readme it is wrong.
>>  
>>   
>>> 6) Welcome to the 1.0.2 release of (Apache) Etch.
>>> 
>>>     
>> 
>> What does this mean?
>>   
> in the readme it is wrong.
>>   
>>> 7) we discussed renaming the c# binding dll to Etch-Csharp.dll but this
>>> hasn't been done.
>>>     
>> 
>> Out of band conversation.. Not on 'etch-dev'. I agree it should be renamed
>> but not for 1.0.2.
>>   
> not so sure about that but ok for now.
>>   
>>> scott out
>>> 
>>> James Dixson wrote:
>>>     
>>>> Ok folks I believe we have a release candidate for 1.0.2. I completed
>>>> the license/txt changes suggested by the Apache-Rat tool and validated
>>>> the builds on Windows, OS X and Ubuntu. I also did some cleanup of the
>>>> top-level directory to reduce clutter.
>>>> 
>>>> The candidate files can be found here:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~dixson/apache-etch/1.0.2-incubating/
>>>> 
>>>> Each file should have a MD5, SHA1 and a Signature. The output from RAT
>>>> is also included "*-rat-output.txt".
>>>> 
>>>> Please take the time to review the archives and then cast your vote. I
>>>> will hold the vote open until the 13th (Friday).
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> james
>>>>   
>>>>       
>> 
>>   
> 

-- 
James Dixson
Manager, Software Development
CUAE Engineering, Cisco Systems
(e) jadixson@cisco.com
(p) 512-336-3305
(m) 512-968-2116