etch-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From scott comer <>
Subject Re: [vote] Release 1.0.2
Date Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:38:47 GMT
shouldn't the files with pgp sigs be named .pgp instead of .asc?

James Dixson wrote:
> Ok folks I believe we have a release candidate for 1.0.2. I completed
> the license/txt changes suggested by the Apache-Rat tool and validated
> the builds on Windows, OS X and Ubuntu. I also did some cleanup of the
> top-level directory to reduce clutter.
> The candidate files can be found here:
> Each file should have a MD5, SHA1 and a Signature. The output from RAT
> is also included "*-rat-output.txt".
Each file should have an MD5, SHA1 and a *PGP *Signature.

> Please take the time to review the archives and then cast your vote. I
> will hold the vote open until the 13th (Friday).
> --
> james

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message