etch-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "J.D. Liau (jliau)" <>
Subject RE: interoperability testing... [again]
Date Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:09:46 GMT
This framework definitely will help Etch developers down the road but I
see this as lower priority item compares to other near term enhancements
such as name service.
What kind of control can the framework have on the interface level?  For
example, each run has different set of values for method parameters.
Extend <stdouttg> and <stderrtag> to support timestamp? 


From: Scott Comer (sccomer) 
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 9:14 AM
Subject: rfc: interoperability testing... [again]

[sorry, i flubbed the link. -scott]

i've put a note up on the wiki about ideas for interoperability testing.

Interoperability Testing Framework

please review and comment.

scott out

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message