esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Richard Hirsch <hirsch.d...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x
Date Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:32:05 GMT
Should I deploy this version on our CloudBees instance?

D.

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Vladimir Ivanov <lester.mail@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Lift 2.4 branch has been merged back into trunk.
>
> Please be aware about possible problems in CSS Selectors in 2.4 version:
>
> https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1110
> https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1111
> https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1114
>
> Vladimir
>
> 14 сентября 2011 г. 17:10 пользователь Ethan Jewett <esjewett@gmail.com>написал:
>
>> Sounds good!
>>
>> 2011/9/14 Vladimir Ivanov <lester.mail@gmail.com>:
>> > Ok, if you guys don't mind I'll merge Lift 2.4 branch back into trunk
>> > (hopefully this evening).
>> >
>> > Vladimir
>> >
>> > 2011/9/13 Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>> >
>> >> I agree - work in the trunk - I assume that Lift 2.4 should be
>> >> finished by the time we release 1.4.
>> >>
>> >> D
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Ethan Jewett <esjewett@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> > Hi Vladimir and all,
>> >> >
>> >> > Hmmm, I guess it depends on whether or not upgrading is required for
>> >> > our 1.4 release. Personally, I think that because of the Textile fixes
>> >> > (at least) we should shoot to include it, in which case we could merge
>> >> > it back in without waiting. This would result in it getting more
>> >> > testing from me, since I at least am developing on trunk and not the
>> >> > Lift 2.4 branch.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thoughts?
>> >> >
>> >> > Ethan
>> >> >
>> >> > 2011/9/13 Vladimir Ivanov <lester.mail@gmail.com>:
>> >> >> Hi Ethan,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Sorry for the late response.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I've fixed сompile-time errors and commited changes, but I think
we
>> need
>> >> >> more time to test it. Moreover I had to remove some members from
>> >> MsgParser
>> >> >> class because they dublicated definitions in Textile's superclass
(in
>> >> its
>> >> >> new version). Some of them were exactly the same, other were slightly
>> >> >> different. So it would be ideal if Vassil find time to review it.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I would wait for at least RC, but if you guys decide that it's
>> >> neccessary
>> >> >> right now - why not?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Vladimir
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2011/9/11 Ethan Jewett <esjewett@gmail.com>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> Hi Vladimir,
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Seems like we should get the branch merged back in to trunk
soon. Do
>> >> >>> you think it would be best to do that on the current 2.4M4,
or would
>> >> >>> it be wiser to wait until later?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Ethan
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com>
>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>> > As Vassil noted, the most important one is Textile update.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > Among other fixes I would also mention fix for dublicated
context
>> >> path
>> >> >>> > problem:
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> http://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1082-redirectresponse-duplicates-contextpath
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > There were many reports and question on StackOverflow
regarding
>> this
>> >> >>> issue.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > Vladimir
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > 2011/9/10 Vassil Dichev <vdichev@apache.org>
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> It should fix the long-standing ESME-307 (Textile
and
>> punctuation)
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Richard Hirsch <
>> >> hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> > Thanks for the update.
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Are there any new features in the release that
might be of
>> >> interest to
>> >> >>> >> ESME?
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > D.
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov
<
>> >> >>> lester.mail@gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >> Below is an small update on current status
for Lift 2.4
>> branch.
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> Lift-2.4M4 was announced yesterday:
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/f695772c254219b2
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> I've updated project files to new version,
but it doesn't
>> compile
>> >> due
>> >> >>> to
>> >> >>> >> >> changes in Loc.Snippet class (it's neccessary
to explicitly
>> >> specify _
>> >> >>> in
>> >> >>> >> >> order to compiler recognize that Snippet's
parameter is a
>> >> function).
>> >> >>> See
>> >> >>> >> >> following link for more details:
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply()+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1
>> >> <
>> >>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply%28%29+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1
>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> I suppose this issue is easy to fix, but
it will take some
>> time
>> >> for
>> >> >>> me
>> >> >>> >> due
>> >> >>> >> >> to extremly high workload (even on this weekend
:s( ).
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> M4 will also make possible moving to 2.9.1
Scala version
>> (after
>> >> all
>> >> >>> >> >> dependencies are updated accordingly).
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> Vladimir
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> 2011/7/27 <in.imtiaz@gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>> Going by the content of the discussion
on this topic for the
>> >> last
>> >> >>> >> couple of
>> >> >>> >> >>> days, it should be possible for Vladimir
to implement the
>> >> >>> replacement,
>> >> >>> >> if
>> >> >>> >> >>> not just port the code from the old Ostrich
code base.
>> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> Hope he finds the time and the inclination!
>> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> Imtiaz
>> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard
Hirsch" <
>> >> >>> >> hirsch.dick@gmail.com
>> >> >>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>> To: <dev@esme.apache.org>
>> >> >>> >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:33 PM
>> >> >>> >> >>> Subject: Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x
>> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>  I think they (twitter) decided that
the HTTP-based stats was
>> >> enough
>> >> >>> or
>> >> >>> >> >>>> the JMX scala code conflicted with
the new Scala version.
>> >> >>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:17 PM,
Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >> >>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> >>>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>> Yes, I wasn't able to find any
replacement too. I also
>> tried
>> >> to
>> >> >>> find
>> >> >>> >> any
>> >> >>> >> >>>>> forum or group to ask about this
modification, but it seems
>> >> >>> there's
>> >> >>> >> no
>> >> >>> >> >>>>> other
>> >> >>> >> >>>>> resources dedicated to this project
besides GitHub.
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>> Next step is to find the reason
of failed tests.
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>> OK - sounds good
>> >> >>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>> Vladimir
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>> 2011/7/27 Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>  Looked at the code last night
and this morning. The JMX
>> >> support
>> >> >>> has
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> been totally removed.
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> I had a quick look and didn't
find anything that might be
>> a
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> replacement. In the meantime,
we'll have to just use the
>> >> >>> HTTP-based
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> interface.
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> D.
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:27
PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >> >>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Thank you, Dick!
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Here is the link to
Ostrich's GitHub repo changeset with
>> >> >>> >> StatsMBean >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> class
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > removed:
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> https://github.com/twitter/**ostrich/commit/**
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> 5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78**309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/**
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> twitter/ostrich<
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> https://github.com/twitter/ostrich/commit/5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/twitter/ostrich
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > May be it helps somehow.
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch
<hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> OK - I'll take a
look at it tonight
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> On Tue, Jul 26,
2011 at 3:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov >> <
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Yes, I had
to comment it out.
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > 2011/7/26 Richard
Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Great.
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Let me
take a look for the StatsMBean replacement.
>> Did
>> >> you
>> >> >>> >> comment
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> out
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> the usage
of StatsMBean to get ESME to compile?
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> D.
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> On Tue,
Jul 26, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > Configgy
is not used for configuration anymore
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > -
Package and method names were changed
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > -
There's no more StatsMBean class (and I have no
>> >> idea
>> >> >>> >> whether
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > any
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > replacement
is available).
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > --
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Best Regards,
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > --
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Best Regards,
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>> --
>> >> >>> >> >>>>> Best Regards,
>> >> >>> >> >>>>> Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> --
>> >> >>> >> >> Best Regards,
>> >> >>> >> >> Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > --
>> >> >>> > Best Regards,
>> >> >>> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Best Regards,
>> >> >> Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Vladimir Ivanov
>

Mime
View raw message