esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Richard Hirsch <hirsch.d...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x
Date Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:01:32 GMT
Thanks

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <lester.mail@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, if you guys don't mind I'll merge Lift 2.4 branch back into trunk
> (hopefully this evening).
>
> Vladimir
>
> 2011/9/13 Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>
>> I agree - work in the trunk - I assume that Lift 2.4 should be
>> finished by the time we release 1.4.
>>
>> D
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Ethan Jewett <esjewett@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Vladimir and all,
>> >
>> > Hmmm, I guess it depends on whether or not upgrading is required for
>> > our 1.4 release. Personally, I think that because of the Textile fixes
>> > (at least) we should shoot to include it, in which case we could merge
>> > it back in without waiting. This would result in it getting more
>> > testing from me, since I at least am developing on trunk and not the
>> > Lift 2.4 branch.
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>> >
>> > Ethan
>> >
>> > 2011/9/13 Vladimir Ivanov <lester.mail@gmail.com>:
>> >> Hi Ethan,
>> >>
>> >> Sorry for the late response.
>> >>
>> >> I've fixed сompile-time errors and commited changes, but I think we need
>> >> more time to test it. Moreover I had to remove some members from
>> MsgParser
>> >> class because they dublicated definitions in Textile's superclass (in
>> its
>> >> new version). Some of them were exactly the same, other were slightly
>> >> different. So it would be ideal if Vassil find time to review it.
>> >>
>> >> I would wait for at least RC, but if you guys decide that it's
>> neccessary
>> >> right now - why not?
>> >>
>> >> Vladimir
>> >>
>> >> 2011/9/11 Ethan Jewett <esjewett@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >>> Hi Vladimir,
>> >>>
>> >>> Seems like we should get the branch merged back in to trunk soon. Do
>> >>> you think it would be best to do that on the current 2.4M4, or would
>> >>> it be wiser to wait until later?
>> >>>
>> >>> Ethan
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> lester.mail@gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> > As Vassil noted, the most important one is Textile update.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Among other fixes I would also mention fix for dublicated context
>> path
>> >>> > problem:
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> http://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1082-redirectresponse-duplicates-contextpath
>> >>> >
>> >>> > There were many reports and question on StackOverflow regarding
this
>> >>> issue.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Vladimir
>> >>> >
>> >>> > 2011/9/10 Vassil Dichev <vdichev@apache.org>
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> It should fix the long-standing ESME-307 (Textile and punctuation)
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Richard Hirsch <
>> hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> wrote:
>> >>> >> > Thanks for the update.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > Are there any new features in the release that might be
of
>> interest to
>> >>> >> ESME?
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > D.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >>> lester.mail@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> wrote:
>> >>> >> >> Below is an small update on current status for Lift
2.4 branch.
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> Lift-2.4M4 was announced yesterday:
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/f695772c254219b2
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> I've updated project files to new version, but it
doesn't compile
>> due
>> >>> to
>> >>> >> >> changes in Loc.Snippet class (it's neccessary to explicitly
>> specify _
>> >>> in
>> >>> >> >> order to compiler recognize that Snippet's parameter
is a
>> function).
>> >>> See
>> >>> >> >> following link for more details:
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply()+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1
>> <
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply%28%29+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1
>> >
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> I suppose this issue is easy to fix, but it will take
some time
>> for
>> >>> me
>> >>> >> due
>> >>> >> >> to extremly high workload (even on this weekend :s(
).
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> M4 will also make possible moving to 2.9.1 Scala version
(after
>> all
>> >>> >> >> dependencies are updated accordingly).
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> Vladimir
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> 2011/7/27 <in.imtiaz@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>> Going by the content of the discussion on this
topic for the
>> last
>> >>> >> couple of
>> >>> >> >>> days, it should be possible for Vladimir to implement
the
>> >>> replacement,
>> >>> >> if
>> >>> >> >>> not just port the code from the old Ostrich code
base.
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> Hope he finds the time and the inclination!
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> Imtiaz
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch"
<
>> >>> >> hirsch.dick@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >>> >
>> >>> >> >>> To: <dev@esme.apache.org>
>> >>> >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:33 PM
>> >>> >> >>> Subject: Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>>  I think they (twitter) decided that the HTTP-based
stats was
>> enough
>> >>> or
>> >>> >> >>>> the JMX scala code conflicted with the new
Scala version.
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Vladimir
Ivanov <
>> >>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>>> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>> Yes, I wasn't able to find any replacement
too. I also tried
>> to
>> >>> find
>> >>> >> any
>> >>> >> >>>>> forum or group to ask about this modification,
but it seems
>> >>> there's
>> >>> >> no
>> >>> >> >>>>> other
>> >>> >> >>>>> resources dedicated to this project besides
GitHub.
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>> Next step is to find the reason of failed
tests.
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>> OK - sounds good
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>> Vladimir
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>> 2011/7/27 Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>  Looked at the code last night and this
morning. The JMX
>> support
>> >>> has
>> >>> >> >>>>>> been totally removed.
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> I had a quick look and didn't find
anything that might be a
>> >>> >> >>>>>> replacement. In the meantime, we'll
have to just use the
>> >>> HTTP-based
>> >>> >> >>>>>> interface.
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> D.
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Vladimir
Ivanov <
>> >>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>>>>> > Thank you, Dick!
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> > Here is the link to Ostrich's
GitHub repo changeset with
>> >>> >> StatsMBean >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> class
>> >>> >> >>>>>> > removed:
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> https://github.com/twitter/**ostrich/commit/**
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> 5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78**309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/**
>> >>> >> >>>>>> twitter/ostrich<
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> https://github.com/twitter/ostrich/commit/5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/twitter/ostrich
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> > May be it helps somehow.
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> OK - I'll take a look at
it tonight
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:12
PM, Vladimir Ivanov >> <
>> >>> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Yes, I had to comment
it out.
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch
<hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Great.
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Let me take a look
for the StatsMBean replacement. Did
>> you
>> >>> >> comment
>> >>> >> >>>>>> out
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> the usage of StatsMBean
to get ESME to compile?
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> D.
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> On Tue, Jul 26,
2011 at 2:45 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >>> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > Configgy is
not used for configuration anymore
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - Package and
method names were changed
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - There's no
more StatsMBean class (and I have no
>> idea
>> >>> >> whether
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > any
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > replacement
is available).
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > --
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Best Regards,
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> > --
>> >>> >> >>>>>> > Best Regards,
>> >>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>> --
>> >>> >> >>>>> Best Regards,
>> >>> >> >>>>> Vladimir Ivanov
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> --
>> >>> >> >> Best Regards,
>> >>> >> >> Vladimir Ivanov
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > --
>> >>> > Best Regards,
>> >>> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Best Regards,
>> >> Vladimir Ivanov
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Vladimir Ivanov
>

Mime
View raw message