esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Richard Hirsch <hirsch.d...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x
Date Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:56:54 GMT
No risk - no fun -

The current version is now deployed on our cloudbees instance --
http://esmecloudserverapache.dickhirsch.staxapps.net

D.

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Vladimir Ivanov <lester.mail@gmail.com> wrote:
> I guess yes if we decided to work with 2.4 version in it's current state.
>
> Vladimir
>
> 2011/9/15 Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>
>> Should I deploy this version on our CloudBees instance?
>>
>> D.
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Vladimir Ivanov <lester.mail@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Lift 2.4 branch has been merged back into trunk.
>> >
>> > Please be aware about possible problems in CSS Selectors in 2.4 version:
>> >
>> > https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1110
>> > https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1111
>> > https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1114
>> >
>> > Vladimir
>> >
>> > 14 сентября 2011 г. 17:10 пользователь Ethan Jewett <esjewett@gmail.com
>> >написал:
>> >
>> >> Sounds good!
>> >>
>> >> 2011/9/14 Vladimir Ivanov <lester.mail@gmail.com>:
>> >> > Ok, if you guys don't mind I'll merge Lift 2.4 branch back into trunk
>> >> > (hopefully this evening).
>> >> >
>> >> > Vladimir
>> >> >
>> >> > 2011/9/13 Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>> >> >
>> >> >> I agree - work in the trunk - I assume that Lift 2.4 should be
>> >> >> finished by the time we release 1.4.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> D
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Ethan Jewett <esjewett@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > Hi Vladimir and all,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Hmmm, I guess it depends on whether or not upgrading is required
>> for
>> >> >> > our 1.4 release. Personally, I think that because of the Textile
>> fixes
>> >> >> > (at least) we should shoot to include it, in which case we
could
>> merge
>> >> >> > it back in without waiting. This would result in it getting
more
>> >> >> > testing from me, since I at least am developing on trunk and
not
>> the
>> >> >> > Lift 2.4 branch.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thoughts?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Ethan
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > 2011/9/13 Vladimir Ivanov <lester.mail@gmail.com>:
>> >> >> >> Hi Ethan,
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Sorry for the late response.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I've fixed сompile-time errors and commited changes,
but I think
>> we
>> >> need
>> >> >> >> more time to test it. Moreover I had to remove some members
from
>> >> >> MsgParser
>> >> >> >> class because they dublicated definitions in Textile's
superclass
>> (in
>> >> >> its
>> >> >> >> new version). Some of them were exactly the same, other
were
>> slightly
>> >> >> >> different. So it would be ideal if Vassil find time to
review it.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I would wait for at least RC, but if you guys decide that
it's
>> >> >> neccessary
>> >> >> >> right now - why not?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Vladimir
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> 2011/9/11 Ethan Jewett <esjewett@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> Hi Vladimir,
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Seems like we should get the branch merged back in
to trunk soon.
>> Do
>> >> >> >>> you think it would be best to do that on the current
2.4M4, or
>> would
>> >> >> >>> it be wiser to wait until later?
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Ethan
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >> >> lester.mail@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> > As Vassil noted, the most important one is Textile
update.
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> > Among other fixes I would also mention fix for
dublicated
>> context
>> >> >> path
>> >> >> >>> > problem:
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1082-redirectresponse-duplicates-contextpath
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> > There were many reports and question on StackOverflow
regarding
>> >> this
>> >> >> >>> issue.
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> > Vladimir
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> > 2011/9/10 Vassil Dichev <vdichev@apache.org>
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> It should fix the long-standing ESME-307
(Textile and
>> >> punctuation)
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Richard Hirsch
<
>> >> >> hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> > Thanks for the update.
>> >> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> > Are there any new features in the release
that might be of
>> >> >> interest to
>> >> >> >>> >> ESME?
>> >> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> > D.
>> >> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Vladimir
Ivanov <
>> >> >> >>> lester.mail@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> >> Below is an small update on current
status for Lift 2.4
>> >> branch.
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> Lift-2.4M4 was announced yesterday:
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/f695772c254219b2
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> I've updated project files to new
version, but it doesn't
>> >> compile
>> >> >> due
>> >> >> >>> to
>> >> >> >>> >> >> changes in Loc.Snippet class (it's
neccessary to explicitly
>> >> >> specify _
>> >> >> >>> in
>> >> >> >>> >> >> order to compiler recognize that
Snippet's parameter is a
>> >> >> function).
>> >> >> >>> See
>> >> >> >>> >> >> following link for more details:
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply()+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1
>> >> >> <
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply%28%29+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> I suppose this issue is easy to
fix, but it will take some
>> >> time
>> >> >> for
>> >> >> >>> me
>> >> >> >>> >> due
>> >> >> >>> >> >> to extremly high workload (even
on this weekend :s( ).
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> M4 will also make possible moving
to 2.9.1 Scala version
>> >> (after
>> >> >> all
>> >> >> >>> >> >> dependencies are updated accordingly).
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> Vladimir
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> 2011/7/27 <in.imtiaz@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>> Going by the content of the
discussion on this topic for
>> the
>> >> >> last
>> >> >> >>> >> couple of
>> >> >> >>> >> >>> days, it should be possible
for Vladimir to implement the
>> >> >> >>> replacement,
>> >> >> >>> >> if
>> >> >> >>> >> >>> not just port the code from
the old Ostrich code base.
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>> Hope he finds the time and the
inclination!
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>> Imtiaz
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>> ----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Hirsch" <
>> >> >> >>> >> hirsch.dick@gmail.com
>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>> To: <dev@esme.apache.org>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011
8:33 PM
>> >> >> >>> >> >>> Subject: Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala
2.9.x
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>  I think they (twitter) decided
that the HTTP-based stats
>> was
>> >> >> enough
>> >> >> >>> or
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>> the JMX scala code conflicted
with the new Scala version.
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at
4:17 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >> >> >>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Yes, I wasn't able to
find any replacement too. I also
>> >> tried
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> >>> find
>> >> >> >>> >> any
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> forum or group to ask
about this modification, but it
>> seems
>> >> >> >>> there's
>> >> >> >>> >> no
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> other
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> resources dedicated
to this project besides GitHub.
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Next step is to find
the reason of failed tests.
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>> OK - sounds good
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Vladimir
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> 2011/7/27 Richard Hirsch
<hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>  Looked at the code
last night and this morning. The JMX
>> >> >> support
>> >> >> >>> has
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> been totally removed.
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> I had a quick look
and didn't find anything that might
>> be
>> >> a
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> replacement. In
the meantime, we'll have to just use
>> the
>> >> >> >>> HTTP-based
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> interface.
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> D.
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26,
2011 at 3:27 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >> >> >>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Thank you,
Dick!
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Here is the
link to Ostrich's GitHub repo changeset
>> with
>> >> >> >>> >> StatsMBean >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> class
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > removed:
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> https://github.com/twitter/**ostrich/commit/**
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> 5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78**309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/**
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> twitter/ostrich<
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://github.com/twitter/ostrich/commit/5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/twitter/ostrich
>> >> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > May be it helps
somehow.
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > 2011/7/26 Richard
Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> OK - I'll
take a look at it tonight
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> On Tue,
Jul 26, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov >>
>> <
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Yes,
I had to comment it out.
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > 2011/7/26
Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
Great.
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
Let me take a look for the StatsMBean
>> replacement.
>> >> Did
>> >> >> you
>> >> >> >>> >> comment
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> out
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
the usage of StatsMBean to get ESME to compile?
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
D.
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Vladimir Ivanov
>> <
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> Configgy is not used for configuration anymore
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> - Package and method names were changed
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> - There's no more StatsMBean class (and I have
>> no
>> >> >> idea
>> >> >> >>> >> whether
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> any
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> replacement is available).
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > --
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Best
Regards,
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Vladimir
Ivanov
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > --
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Best Regards,
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> --
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Best Regards,
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> --
>> >> >> >>> >> >> Best Regards,
>> >> >> >>> >> >> Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> > --
>> >> >> >>> > Best Regards,
>> >> >> >>> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> Best Regards,
>> >> >> >> Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Best Regards,
>> >> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Vladimir Ivanov
>

Mime
View raw message