esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Richard Hirsch <hirsch.d...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Branch cleanup
Date Wed, 06 Apr 2011 12:23:39 GMT
Thanks

D.

On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Ethan Jewett <esjewett@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, I'll delete them all except for the comet rewrite branch when I
> have the chance.
>
> Cheers,
> Ethan
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Anne Kathrine Petter√łe
> <yojibee@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I am not working in any of the branches..
>>
>> /Anne
>>
>> On 3 April 2011 13:58, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in.imtiaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I did practically nothing on that branch before I had questions about how
>>> prevalent and therefore how necessary pubsubhubub was for ESME particularly
>>> after the originator Ethan said, that he kind of started it a 'science
>>> project' for himself, in one of his replies.
>>>
>>> We should just go ahead and delete that branch. We can always create an
>>> upto-date one in the future, if I or someone else decides to resume work on
>>> the feature.
>>>
>>> Imtiaz
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>>> To: <dev@esme.apache.org>
>>> Cc: "Ethan Jewett" <esjewett@gmail.com>
>>> Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2011 5:01 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Branch cleanup
>>>
>>>
>>>> what about the pubsubhubbub branches? can we use any of code from
>>>> these branches?
>>>>
>>>> I don't know how far Imtiaz got or whether we should even support it
>>>> anymore.....
>>>>
>>>> I'm fine with deleting the other ones.
>>>>
>>>> D.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Ethan Jewett <esjewett@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> .0/
>>>>> lift-2.2/
>>>>> metadata/
>>>>> pubsubhubbub/
>>>>> pubsubhubbub-2/
>>>>> update_box_redesign/
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message