Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37424 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2010 08:22:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Dec 2010 08:22:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 92186 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2010 08:22:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 92157 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2010 08:22:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 92149 invoked by uid 99); 16 Dec 2010 08:22:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 08:22:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of esjewett@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.175] (HELO mail-wy0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 08:22:48 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so2342201wyb.6 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:22:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JIGpZQqETpceFB1kJTRV85h10yIwc6m4fjcg3dQToRE=; b=doWevOZ64PSzPtWB+Q5qIY55nvzYUuVLa3t0gONtyC2H1mKZTFLQssWhEGK9izLAcb tKHh9WK6sFWGP1E5jHtFjf9WHgxXkYcvf1kicp7gScNObnzOpCpQKPQb1TShdUSa4+Li BRuAm0iKzC2N/ahY9GjAtc+tC1z/RReubfvzs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=dXJmVRioe+FRnVWydqLOpS6lrxL+9lyKqGXtzNvha43VewYeZqkwkRdb7RaNLvReFr U93+0FMtexOOzMoeMZJb4Q+KPyHQXeEXV27HQbGGt2zaE9n87TvF8Rcnxan4BlqMx0mY 5XkrVqp8L69NgnXhEtjRDVPvYHzzNe6TY6zIM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.150.134 with SMTP id z6mr1197523wej.27.1292487747342; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:22:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.74.69 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:22:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:22:27 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Change for ESME-274 (was: Move to latest Lift release for 2.2) From: Ethan Jewett To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Looks good. I'm pulling this out into another thread so that it doesn't get lost in the flood of messages about Lift 2.2. I think this patch should be applied to trunk, not the branch. We should be able to use the file that Vladimir submitted to Jira because the file should be identical in trunk and the branch. Thanks, Ethan On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Vladimir Ivanov w= rote: > Anne, > > I applied it to 2.2 branch, but changes are related only to UI and don't > depend on Lift version, so I think it's possible to apply it to trunk as > well. But before someone of ESME developers should check it locally and, = in > case it works as expected, commit it. > > 2010/12/16 Anne Kathrine Petter=F8e > >> OK, is it committed yet? >> (I haven't seen it...) >> >> >> On 15 December 2010 22:12, Richard Hirsch wrote: >> > Right now just to the branch. >> > >> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Anne Kathrine Petter=F8e >> > wrote: >> >> Vladimir, >> >> >> >> Which branch did you work in for ESME-274? >> >> Should your patch be committed only to the 2.2 branch, to the main >> >> trunk or both? >> >> >> >> /Anne >> >> >> >> On 15 December 2010 19:03, Vladimir Ivanov >> wrote: >> >>> Guys, >> >>> >> >>> Lift 2.2-RC2 has been announced today: >> http://lift.la/announcing-lift-22-rc2 >> >>> >> >>> I tried to update project to >> this >> >>> version locally. Source code was compiled and all tests were passed, >> but I >> >>> experienced problem at runtime: I'm unable to post new message to >> timeline, >> >>> after pressing 'Update' button nothing happens. IE7 returns JavaScri= pt >> error >> >>> in post_msg function: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> This function is implemented in UserSnip.postScript() method. May be >> >>> somthing was changed in JSON processing... Do you guys discover the >> same? >> >>> >> >>> Btw, I tried to make minor fix for ESME-274 UI issue, it works for m= e, >> could >> >>> someone of developers check it on Lift2.2-RC1? >> >>> >> >>> 2010/12/14 Richard Hirsch >> >>> >> >>>> Just deployed a clean version on Stax and it works. Yeah. >> >>>> >> >>>> Serves me right for playing around with my deployments. >> >>>> >> >>>> Please test. >> >>>> >> >>>> If tests go well today and tomorrow, we could merge the branch into >> the >> >>>> trunk. >> >>>> >> >>>> D. >> >>>> >> >>>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Vladimir Ivanov < >> lester.mail@gmail.com> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>> > Ethan, >> >>>> > >> >>>> > I'm using Chrome 8.0.552.224 beta on Windows right now. I'll try >> Firefox >> >>>> 3.5 >> >>>> > and IE 7 when you deploy new version. >> >>>> > >> >>>> > 2010/12/14 Richard Hirsch >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> Wait a second. I could be the cause of the error - I forgot to >> change >> >>>> >> a test Javascript that I changed. >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> Deploying again.... >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> D. >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Ethan Jewett >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>> >> > Ok, this prompted me to check in IE and I am indeed getting a >> >>>> >> > javascript error there. I'm not going to be able to recreate t= hat >> >>>> >> > locally because I am not set up to build ESME on Windows. >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > What version of Chrome are you using? >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > Vladimir, what browser are you using? >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > Dick, you can switch it back whenever you want. Seems that it = is >> a JS >> >>>> >> > error in the message display code and we'll have to work throu= gh >> that. >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > Ethan >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Richard Hirsch < >> >>>> hirsch.dick@gmail.com> >> >>>> >> wrote: >> >>>> >> >> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Ethan Jewett < >> esjewett@gmail.com> >> >>>> >> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>> It is working fine for me - Chrome on Windows at the moment. >> >>>> >> >>> http://esmecloudserverapache.dickhirsch.staxapps.net/ - righ= t? >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> Can you see my new messages? >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> Nope. >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> Ethan >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Richard Hirsch < >> >>>> hirsch.dick@gmail.com> >> >>>> >> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> I just looked. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> The data is there but still it doesn't work in IE or Chrome= . >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Please tell me when I can redeploy the older version. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> D. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Richard Hirsch < >> >>>> >> hirsch.dick@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> Redeployed the 2.2 version on stax. It still doesn't work = me. >> >>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>> Please test. >> >>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>> D. >> >>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Ethan Jewett < >> esjewett@gmail.com >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>>> Hi Vladimir, >> >>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>>> On Stax we are using an external MySQL database, so the o= ld >> >>>> messages >> >>>> >> >>>>>> should persist. >> >>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>>> Dick, how hard would it be to redeploy the Lift 2.2 versi= on >> to >> >>>> Stax? >> >>>> >> >>>>>> I'd like to take a look and see if the problem is on the >> >>>> front-end >> >>>> >> (a >> >>>> >> >>>>>> javascript issue). >> >>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>>> Ethan >> >>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Vladimir Ivanov < >> >>>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>>>> As far as I understand, for embedded Derby instance in >> another >> >>>> >> branch >> >>>> >> >>>>>>> (folder) it will be completely new instance, without dat= a. >> >>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>> 2010/12/14 Richard Hirsch >> >>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> I looked at the log on stax and I didn't see any errors= . I >> >>>> didn't >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> create any new messages I just looked to see if existin= g >> ones >> >>>> >> showed >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> up. >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> I haven't tried the new version locally - maybe, you co= uld >> give >> >>>> it >> >>>> >> a try. >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> D. >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Vladimir Ivanov < >> >>>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> > Richard, >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> > Have you seen any exceptions, errors etc? New message= s >> aren't >> >>>> >> posted and >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> > displayed in timeline, are them? >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> > 2010/12/14 Richard Hirsch >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> just deployed on stax and saw that the timelines did= n't >> >>>> work, >> >>>> >> so I >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> redeployed an older version. >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> So it looks like we have some more work to do with t= he >> 2.2 >> >>>> >> port. >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> D. >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Ethan Jewett < >> >>>> >> esjewett@gmail.com> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> > "list :-) newItem" means "replace the last item in >> the >> >>>> list >> >>>> >> with >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> > newItem". Obviously ;-) >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:16 AM, >> >>>> >> darren.hague@fortybeans.com >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> > wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> Was that a smiley at the end, or another new >> operator...? >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> On 14 December 2010 at 07:07 Ethan Jewett < >> >>>> >> esjewett@gmail.com> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> Thanks both of you. This is great! :-) >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> I love learning something new this early in the >> morning, >> >>>> >> even if it >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> is >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> a little bit early for that many : + and =3D >> operators :-) >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> Ethan >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Vassil Dichev < >> >>>> >> vdichev@apache.org> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> >> Thanks to Richard, Ethan and Vassil, it seems >> ESME >> >>>> has >> >>>> >> been >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> successfully >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> >> migrated to Scala 2.8 and Lift 2.2! >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> > >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> > ... and thanks to your quick help! Also: "Yay = for >> >>>> tests"! >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> > >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> > -- >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> > Best Regards, >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> > Vladimir Ivanov >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>> -- >> >>>> >> >>>>>>> Best Regards, >> >>>> >> >>>>>>> Vladimir Ivanov >> >>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > -- >> >>>> > Best Regards, >> >>>> > Vladimir Ivanov >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Best Regards, >> >>> Vladimir Ivanov >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > > > > -- > Best Regards, > Vladimir Ivanov >