Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76026 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2010 14:13:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Nov 2010 14:13:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 65113 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 14:14:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 65044 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 14:14:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 65031 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2010 14:14:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 14:14:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hirsch.dick@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.175] (HELO mail-iw0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 14:14:10 +0000 Received: by iwn42 with SMTP id 42so783676iwn.6 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 07:13:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=4mXxe+oYvipw5zmetBQxMjpnnRG+B4dK9Uy2AahxmA4=; b=q0R/RdrDZqeY36meXLplKDlTJEaJb130nR8aGDzzhwLpGkky2RuQQgDDOdNmeg5N12 uGS3frex9htBaPEnyC7+QHiTx72xNtVMpsBp+lFmE1UZPjqTBTd0wvNSRuXRfbSpdw9u bfAgGbNNhqXazWIzLAlGC97Y4jk5BWsdL5qDk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=my4EdM5gRSJAIXi8jPTzV0WhlLj8u85oS3fapfqYy5tUoVPc2jPXStWm/2f4UHZhdy oKByz6MRGzQ+iJgjC6SX7DlSkzDUXahuo9DEiFeGtLrQz1u3UYVxbjJL1FxYagxH5sLD x9K6iqjBePtGArpaIpFbL6iXb8W9cw9Or98DE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.167.196 with SMTP id r4mr4496598iby.29.1288793629232; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 07:13:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.30.76 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 07:13:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 15:13:49 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Branch clean up From: Richard Hirsch To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The three RCs were our attempts before we finally got it right - I'd like to delete them - anyone have a problem with that. D. On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Ethan Jewett wrote: > Yes, I suppose I did, though I didn't remember exactly which release they > were from :-) > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Richard Hirsch wrote: > >> Do you mean the RCs: >> >> apache-esme-1.1-RC1-incubating >> apache-esme-1.1-RC2-incubating >> apache-esme-1.1-RC3-incubating >> >> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Ethan Jewett wrote: >> > Sounds good to me. >> > >> > What do you think about getting rid of the non-released tags? >> > >> > Ethan >> > >> > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Richard Hirsch > >wrote: >> > >> >> Right now, we have 4 branches: >> >> >> >> * lift-2.0 >> >> * metadata >> >> * pubsubhubbub >> >> * pubsubhubbub-2 >> >> >> >> Can we delete some of these branches? I assume we can delete . >> >> * lift-2.0 >> >> * metadata >> >> >> >> Any problems with that? >> >> >> >> D. >> >> >> > >> >