esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ethan Jewett <>
Subject Re: Discussion of LDAP on lift list
Date Fri, 26 Nov 2010 11:30:16 GMT
For what it´s worth (not much), my impression is that what we need to
implement LDAP support is just the Lift LDAP Vendor. We would need to
implement our own auth provider in ESME using that vendor, just like
we do for OpenID or username/password auth. So I think what has been
done is good for us overall, though it would be really nice if the
vendor provided easy access to group information as well.

Does that sound about right?


On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Vassil Dichev <> wrote:
> I usually don't have time to read the whole discussion and so I'm
> usually just checking the thread subject. I'll try to dig in deeper
> during the weekend.
> From a pragmatic standpoint LDAP might not be the first thing to
> implement next if it's going to change a lot. I was thinking of XMPP
> support, but this might be also obsolete when/if we have Akka/Camel
> integration.
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Richard Hirsch <> wrote:
>> Don't know whether anyone else is following the discussions about LDAP
>> on the lift list. They are currently doing a major rewrite of the code
>> and I'm trying to talk about our (ESME) requirements
>> (
>> .  If anyone else wants to chime in, that would be great. I can give
>> basic requirements but they are asking for more details for the entire
>> module which is a bit of challenge for me based on my still limited
>> understanding of the lift internals.
>> D.
> --
> Twitter:
> Blog:

View raw message