Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73776 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2010 10:00:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Sep 2010 10:00:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 71099 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2010 10:00:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-esme-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 71039 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2010 10:00:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact esme-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 71030 invoked by uid 99); 28 Sep 2010 10:00:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:00:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hirsch.dick@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.175] (HELO mail-iw0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:00:10 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so3946565iwn.6 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 02:59:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lw3t9hofCD6mNmbVNSTtZdULSGODLd5MwszgbrIlwjQ=; b=Lem9o5imqedA/M5sNrn3CUfhiFmbIG957OD7ASLsMAlnqbGh0YobjsVxqwbttb/Tty swJOx4wnXJkDn8hYFKCOBSqAIEwoz0htis1lxuIBPbafOzGoROJX4QgqeoajKNayhsGc Xg1QPcjupWvY2BuLMx+YgEIJTMbU5MCCDxIj4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=iGFb2otBFPaDw2IjfNs7d7yjjepHYbu3KHRwbZ80eRwITKU660tKLmQnG/YiknVpyl GKKN2g1WJ1doN798VAnfPP7NiRqusyFAyDtvjkr0TqJ2/jrTwgj4adjz+E+bcKfS89EI YWRnuIQLwFqe+JWNQ8tgnkYIFE/uHfJThA9MQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.155.212 with SMTP id t20mr10726784ibw.37.1285667988760; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 02:59:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.202.146 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 02:59:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:59:48 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of apache-esme-incubating-1.1 - Second vote From: Richard Hirsch To: esme-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I had to create a new KEYS file, because I had a hard-disk crash and lost my old gpg installation. In the meantime, I also have a new laptop. So I created a new KEYS file on the new machine. On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Richard Hirsch wrote: >> ...I have posted our candidate for the second Apache release developed >> within the ESME podling. I've removed the KEYS file from the release >> and include the fix for the "resend bug"... > > I'm checking the release but cannot find your signing key, those files > are different: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/esme/trunk/KEYS > http://apache.org/dist/incubator/esme/KEYS > > IMO they should be identical, and using gpg --import none of them > provides the FA51B6C5 key that was used to create > apache-esme-1.1-incubating.src.tar.gz.asc, they provide the 6FACF917 > key. > > I might be doing something wrong, how did you verify that signature? > > -Bertrand >