esme-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anne Kathrine Petter√łe <yoji...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of apache-esme-incubating-1.1 - Second vote
Date Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:38:17 GMT
Do we need to vote again?

/Anne

On 29 September 2010 13:56, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz@apache.org>wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> > <bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>...
> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/esme/trunk/THIRD-PARTY.txt
> >>
> >> Format looks ok but I don't think we can release with dependencies
> >> that have unknown licenses.
> >> Those should be tracked down or eliminated, IMO.
> >
> > But I added in the file "We've tracked down the licenses for these
> > dependents accordingly: " with the details lower in the file. Do we
> > need more than that?
>
> Ah sorry, didn't realize the last paragraph refers to those licenses, my
> bad.
>
> I have reformatted that file to make things clearer, and I think asm
> and cglib still need clarification, if I read your mvn site output
> correctly.
>
> -Bertrand
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message